Re: [Mailman-Users] Sender details and anonymous list

2004-11-01 Thread Brad Knowles
At 1:45 PM +0900 2004-11-01, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: The address itself is _not_ optional in Internet mail, and the "official" Mailman distribution will not support omitting it, I'm sure (ie, I would bet a large sum of money against a rather small amount of money -- it's not my decision

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sender details and anonymous list

2004-10-31 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
> "Miles" == Miles Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Miles> The anonymous list correctly removes the details of who in Miles> the team sent the message, and replaces it with the lists Miles> email address. I have been asked to set this so that it is Miles> a specific name, ra

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sender details and anonymous list

2004-10-31 Thread Mark Sapiro
Miles Waller wrote: > >I have set up an anonymous list - it's for announcements from a central >team to subscribers only, no discussions. > >It's all working great, exactly as required ... with one tiny problem. >The anonymous list correctly removes the details of who in the team sent >the mess

[Mailman-Users] Sender details and anonymous list

2004-10-28 Thread Miles Waller
Hi, I have set up an anonymous list - it's for announcements from a central team to subscribers only, no discussions. It's all working great, exactly as required ... with one tiny problem. The anonymous list correctly removes the details of who in the team sent the message, and replaces it wit