Re: [Mailman-Users] Scaling Mailman

2001-10-01 Thread Amanda
Hi, qmail is PDQ as well - when we run the newsletter, we queue up 30,000 messages at once in a matter of minutes; after fifteen minutes the queue is down to a few hundred, and the vast majority of those are international and/or busted receiving hosts that are failing connect on the first try (an

Re: [Mailman-Users] Scaling Mailman

2001-09-29 Thread Chris Greer
We are currently using sendmail, but are investigating postfix. Chris G. Mike Horwath wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 05:00:32PM -0500, Chris Greer wrote: > > Right now we are running on Solaris, and for political and financial > > reasons, that will probably not change in the next year or s

Re: [Mailman-Users] Scaling Mailman

2001-09-29 Thread Mike Horwath
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 05:00:32PM -0500, Chris Greer wrote: > Right now we are running on Solaris, and for political and financial > reasons, that will probably not change in the next year or so. Solaris is cool. > We are also running our lists on the mail server with users. We are > strongly

[Mailman-Users] Scaling Mailman

2001-09-29 Thread Chris Greer
We've been using Mailman for a while now, (still actually running Version 1.1). We've started to hit some problems with high message volumes to individual list. We are seeing multiple python processes trying to deliver to the same mailing list, and getting hung waiting on CPU. As we start loki