Allan Herman wrote:
>Why don't you just reject/discard all email unless it is from a subscriber?
Discard is fine, but Reject is bad as it just causes backscatter to the
innocent 3rd parties whose addresses are spoofed in the From: of the
spam.
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers
Fred Atkinson wrote:
>
> Is there any way to set Mailman to just delete these messages rather
> than hold them for approval?
Set Privacy options... -> Sender filters -> generic_nonmember_action to
Discard
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Califo
You just need to harden the spam filtering implementation on your SMTP
server. Mailman will NOT do it for you.
On 30 March 2013 16:55, Fred Atkinson wrote:
> I have several lists that are receiving SPAM messages from multiple
> sources. The lists do not forward them since I have it set n
Why don't you just reject/discard all email unless it is from a subscriber?
On 03-30-2013, at 9:55 AM, Fred Atkinson wrote:
> I have several lists that are receiving SPAM messages from multiple
> sources. The lists do not forward them since I have it set not to.
>
> But often I ha
I have several lists that are receiving SPAM messages from multiple
sources. The lists do not forward them since I have it set not to.
But often I have to go through the process of manually deleting them from
the queue and I get messages telling me how many messages are pending ap
