Re: [Mailman-Users] SMART_ADDRESS_MATCH isn't very

2002-07-15 Thread Bob Weissman
At 01:54 PM 7/15/02, Jerry Stratton wrote: >>I have a user subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] who just posted to a >>members-only list as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Because of Sun's email setup, >>this is out of the user's control.) The posting failed to go through >>even though SMART_ADDRESS_MATCH was set t

Re: [Mailman-Users] SMART_ADDRESS_MATCH isn't very

2002-07-15 Thread Jerry Stratton
>I have a user subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] who just posted to a >members-only list as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Because of Sun's email setup, >this is out of the user's control.) The posting failed to go through >even though SMART_ADDRESS_MATCH was set to 1. > >Has anyone else hit this problem and fo

[Mailman-Users] SMART_ADDRESS_MATCH isn't very

2002-07-14 Thread Bob Weissman
Defaults.py says: # When true, Mailman will consider [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be the same address as # user@domain. If set to 0, Mailman will consider [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be the # same address as [EMAIL PROTECTED], but different than user@domain. Usernames # will al