Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply-To in 2.1b3 changed

2002-08-14 Thread Peter Bengtson
Excellent - thanks for the info! / Peter "Barry A. Warsaw" wrote: > > > "PB" == Peter Bengtson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > PB> The design team has for some reason decided to include the > PB> Description of the list (entered on the General Options page) > PB> in the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply-To in 2.1b3 changed

2002-08-14 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "PB" == Peter Bengtson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: PB> The design team has for some reason decided to include the PB> Description of the list (entered on the General Options page) PB> in the Reply-To and To headers. This is, IMHO, a Bad PB> Idea. Furthermore, there seems to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply-To in 2.1b3 changed

2002-08-14 Thread Peter Bengtson
Tom Whiting wrote: > > This is something that was enabled by you. > To change that, go through the config pages of your individual list, and find > out how to change it back to what it should be. > By default, mailman sets the reply to the USER that posted the mail. Anyhing > other than that is

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply-To in 2.1b3 changed

2002-08-14 Thread Tom Whiting
This is something that was enabled by you. To change that, go through the config pages of your individual list, and find out how to change it back to what it should be. By default, mailman sets the reply to the USER that posted the mail. Anyhing other than that is a result of an administrative e

[Mailman-Users] Reply-To in 2.1b3 changed

2002-08-14 Thread Peter Bengtson
In 2.1b3, as opposed to 2.1b2, the Reply-To and To fields now include the _entire_ description of the list as configured on the General Options page. See below: > Subject: Re: [Blah] Question >Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:34:28 +0200 >From: Peter Bengtson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >