Re: [Mailman-Users] Released: Mailman 2.1.7b1

2005-12-30 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* John W. Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ah. There is a difference between the line endings on the wire, which the > RFC is discussing, and the line endings on some particular machine. On the > wire, the sequence will (almost certainly) become > and then (probably) switch back upon arrival on a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Released: Mailman 2.1.7b1

2005-12-29 Thread John W. Baxter
On 12/29/05 11:11 AM, "Ralf Hildebrandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> So I should go for python 2.4? > > I installed python2.4, stopped the queuerunner and linked > /usr/bin/python2.4 <- /usr/bin/python and restarted the queuerunner. > > The "problem

Re: [Mailman-Users] Released: Mailman 2.1.7b1

2005-12-29 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > So I should go for python 2.4? I installed python2.4, stopped the queuerunner and linked /usr/bin/python2.4 <- /usr/bin/python and restarted the queuerunner. The "problem" seems to remain. So, I had a closer look: 1) mutt displays the Subject: header OK

Re: [Mailman-Users] Released: Mailman 2.1.7b1

2005-12-29 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* John W. Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ralf, it would be useful to know what version of Python you are using with > Mailman. Python 2.3.5 (#2, Aug 30 2005, 15:50:26) [GCC 4.0.2 20050821 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.1-6)] on linux2 > As I read CookHeaders.py, the relevant code there looks right wi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Released: Mailman 2.1.7b1

2005-12-29 Thread John W. Baxter
On 12/25/05 11:57 PM, "Ralf Hildebrandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * John W. Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> It doesn't look folded correctly in Ralf's message as received here. I >> don't see whitespace after the CR LF. Thus the second part isn't a proper >> continuation of the header. >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Released: Mailman 2.1.7b1

2005-12-25 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* John W. Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It doesn't look folded correctly in Ralf's message as received here. I > don't see whitespace after the CR LF. Thus the second part isn't a proper > continuation of the header. Oh, correct. I didn't notice this either. Good point!! > This lack of white s

Re: [Mailman-Users] Released: Mailman 2.1.7b1

2005-12-25 Thread John W. Baxter
On 12/24/05 8:23 AM, "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > >> As you can see, = >> >> Subject: webKess Stations- / Abteilungsregistrierung Elisabeth_KH.1049 >> was transformed into >> Subject: [webKess] webKess Stations- / >> Abteilungsregistrierung??Elisabeth_KH.1

Re: [Mailman-Users] Released: Mailman 2.1.7b1

2005-12-24 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > So Mailman has folded a long subject according to RFC 2822 section > 2.2.3, and it is not being properly unfolded by Postfix for logging. > > Or is there some other problem that I'm not seeing? The problem is that the user's email client cannot display that f

Re: [Mailman-Users] Released: Mailman 2.1.7b1

2005-12-24 Thread Mark Sapiro
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: >As you can see, = > >Subject: webKess Stations- / Abteilungsregistrierung Elisabeth_KH.1049 >was transformed into >Subject: [webKess] webKess Stations- / >Abteilungsregistrierung??Elisabeth_KH.1049 > >(?? denotes a non-8-bit character). I wonder why a mere "space" sign >n

Re: [Mailman-Users] Released: Mailman 2.1.7b1

2005-12-24 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > * Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > (?? denotes a non-8-bit character). > > ?? denotes 2 non-printable characters. I'd need to check which ones > EXACTLY. Found out: It's a CR LF. -- Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROT

Re: [Mailman-Users] Released: Mailman 2.1.7b1

2005-12-24 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > (?? denotes a non-8-bit character). ?? denotes 2 non-printable characters. I'd need to check which ones EXACTLY. -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/list

Re: [Mailman-Users] Released: Mailman 2.1.7b1

2005-12-24 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Tokio Kikuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi all, > > I've just released Mailman 2.1.7rc1 Release Candidate. I'm sorry for > the violation of file name extension convention because I made a small > mistake when tagging the release number. I will be releasing 2.1.7 > final by December 31 if there

[Mailman-Users] Released: Mailman 2.1.7b1

2005-12-23 Thread Tokio Kikuchi
Hi all, I've just released Mailman 2.1.7rc1 Release Candidate. I'm sorry for the violation of file name extension convention because I made a small mistake when tagging the release number. I will be releasing 2.1.7 final by December 31 if there is no problem. Please download it from SF or:

[Mailman-Users] Released: Mailman 2.1.7b1

2005-12-19 Thread Tokio Kikuchi
Hi all, I've just released Mailman 2.1.7b1 for beta test and i18n translations. I'm tempted to jump into RC because the 2.1-maint branch is so stable and 2.1.7 is mainly for bug fixes, but we need more translations before the final release. Please download it from SF or: http://mm.tkikuchi.net/