Dennis Putnam wrote:
>
>On 9/25/2012 4:37 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> Dennis Putnam wrote:
>>> Interestingly, the vette log has nothing in it for those rejects.
>>> Perhaps that is a clue to the problem.
>>
>> When you reject the message from the admindb page, does the admindb
>> page refresh and no
On 9/25/2012 4:37 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Dennis Putnam wrote:
>> Interestingly, the vette log has nothing in it for those rejects.
>> Perhaps that is a clue to the problem.
>
> When you reject the message from the admindb page, does the admindb
> page refresh and no longer show the held post?
Cor
Dennis Putnam wrote:
>
>Interestingly, the vette log has nothing in it for those rejects.
>Perhaps that is a clue to the problem.
When you reject the message from the admindb page, does the admindb
page refresh and no longer show the held post?
Is there anything in Mailman's error log from the t
Interestingly, the vette log has nothing in it for those rejects.
Perhaps that is a clue to the problem. It appears to be none of the
above. I have not implemented SSL yet so that is out. It must be saving
my changes because when I revisit the admin page, the radio button is
correct and no redirect
Dennis Putnam wrote:
>
>I didn't send a reason explicitly. Since the reason was given as part of
>the admin display, I thought that reason would go to the member as part
>of the rejection message. Is that not the case? If not, I would consider
>that a bug.
It is the case that the default reason s
I didn't send a reason explicitly. Since the reason was given as part of
the admin display, I thought that reason would go to the member as part
of the rejection message. Is that not the case? If not, I would consider
that a bug.
On 9/24/2012 11:06 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> Mailman 2.1.15.
Mailman 2.1.15. My reasons, unless I fail to give, always gets to the
member/member-to-be.
However, they fail to read them quite often!
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Dennis Putnam wrote:
> I am getting complaints from list members that their messages are being
> rejected without a reason. Wh
I am getting complaints from list members that their messages are being
rejected without a reason. When I look at the message from the admin
page, the reason show us there but when I reject the message the member
apparently does not get that. Do I have something configured wrong?
signature.asc
D
