On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:53:15 -0800 Mark Sapiro wrote:
> I suspect you have an old Mailman version. Prior to Mailman 2.1.7, the
> regular expression search was not multiline
That's the answer, I'm using 2.1.5 from RHEL 4.
Thanks very much for your help with this!
--
David E. Bernholdt
Mark Sapiro wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>Here's the result: In applying header_filter_rules, it looks like the
>>entire set of headers is being treated as a single multiline string.
>
>
>That is correct.
>
>
>>For reasons I don't entirely understand (remember I'm not a python
>>expert), "
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>Here's the result: In applying header_filter_rules, it looks like the
>entire set of headers is being treated as a single multiline string.
That is correct.
>For reasons I don't entirely understand (remember I'm not a python
>expert), "^" and "$" are not matching the
Okay, it looks like the header_filter_rules are getting set correctly
through all interfaces, including the web u/i -- I have been unable to
reproduce the errors I had initially observed with escaping of
backslashes. Perhaps I got my tests muddled.
I've also spent some time figuring out why even
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:35:12 -0800 Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> Are you saying you see this with bin/dumpdb of the config.pck. If so,
>> that's just the way python is showing the representation of the
>> string. It is not the actual value of the string. If you doubt that,
>> tr
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:35:12 -0800 Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Are you saying you see this with bin/dumpdb of the config.pck. If so,
> that's just the way python is showing the representation of the
> string. It is not the actual value of the string. If you doubt that,
> try 'strings' instead of 'bin/dum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>If I use a simple regex, like
>'^x-spam-flag: *yes'
>it seems to show up properly in the configuration. But if I use a
>more precise regex that accounts for all forms of whitespace with the
>"\s" sequence, like this
>'^\s*x-s
Our corporate mail gateway adds a header to flag things it believes
are spam. I'd like to be able to take advantage of this in my Mailman
lists. I'm having some problems setting the header_filter_rules
properly.
If I use a simple regex, like
'^x-spam-flag: *yes'
it seem
--On Friday, September 10, 2004 11:43 am +0200 martin f krafft
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
also sprach Ian Eiloart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.09.10.1136 +0200]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cvs\.ailab.\.ch$
^
|
++
|
That extra dot looks wro
also sprach Ian Eiloart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.09.10.1136 +0200]:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cvs\.ailab.\.ch$
> ^
> |
>++
>|
> That extra dot looks wrong
Oh my. Sorry for the noise. There's something to be said about "four
eyes see
--On Thursday, September 9, 2004 6:27 pm +0200 martin f krafft
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I promise, I searched the web for this, but all I could find was
information that I am doing this right. I am trying to get a CVS
commits list to accept mails from our CVS domain, using the
following regexp
I promise, I searched the web for this, but all I could find was
information that I am doing this right. I am trying to get a CVS
commits list to accept mails from our CVS domain, using the
following regexp:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@cvs\.ailab.\.ch$
However, this is not matching, I still have to moder
Thanks!
My Python is sadly lacking, I'm afraid. I was able to use the method
below to search for a string in the address and remove it. Reckon it's
worth adding to the FAQ?
Cheers
Adam.
--
Adam Steer
Web publishing officer
Australian Library and Information Association
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://
On Aug 25, 2004, at 13:22, Adam Steer wrote:
tried that already, with abysmal failure. I couldn't generate a regular
expression that would work with 'withlist' either - some hand-editing
of
the condig.db revealed that the address was malformed very badly -
$ bin/withlist -l mylist
>>> deletions =
Thanks Jim
tried that already, with abysmal failure. I couldn't generate a regular
expression that would work with 'withlist' either - some hand-editing of
the condig.db revealed that the address was malformed very badly -
interpreted about four different ways. Homage to Mailman's valiant
attempts
On Aug 24, 2004, at 15:21, Adam Steer wrote:
I'm wondering if it is possible to use regular expressions in
'remove_members'. I have a subscriber who has a curly quote in their
subscribed address - which has thrown the web membership management
interface for the relevant list off the planet, and I h
Hi All
I'm wondering if it is possible to use regular expressions in
'remove_members'. I have a subscriber who has a curly quote in their
subscribed address - which has thrown the web membership management
interface for the relevant list off the planet, and I haven't been able
to work around it an
Assuming you are using MM 2.1.x
I think you may have missed this in the help descriptions of the
Sender Filters Privacy options fields:
start the line with a ^ character to designate a regular expression
match
I would quess you want to say:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@(.+\.|)duke\.edu$
in the accept_
Dear Mailman users (and hopefully administrators and/or programmers),
We have some campus lists that we'd like to leave open to members and
everybody with addresses such as (in regexp form)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
but cause all postings from non-duke.edu addresses to be held for the
moderator. I ca
At 2002-02-25 17:01 -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
>Are you talking about the python version on lists.sourceforge.net?
>Because if so:
>usw-sf-list1:~# python -V
>Python 2.1.1
Marc,
Yes. Thanks for the information. :-)
I believe this is a valid list manager question. That's why I asked here
instead
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 07:47:31AM -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Marc MERLIN knows which version of Python runs on the SF list server. I
> hope he is reading this thread, so he can enlighten us.
Already done, but please, if you need sf.net support, submit a support
request on the sf.net web s
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 04:38:56PM -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
> John,
> Thanks for responding. The Mailman version is 2.0.5 patched by Marc MERLIN
> on SourceForge. The Python version is 1.5.
Are you talking about the python version on lists.sourceforge.net?
Because if so:
usw-sf-list1:~# python
At 2002-02-21 17:05 -0800, John W Baxter wrote:
>At 16:38 -0800 2/21/2002, Mike Noyes wrote:
> >Thanks for responding. The Mailman version is 2.0.5 patched by Marc
> >MERLIN on SourceForge. The Python version is 1.5.
> >
> >I'd like to use the (?!...) negative lookahead assertion, but I'm not
> >h
At 16:38 -0800 2/21/2002, Mike Noyes wrote:
>Thanks for responding. The Mailman version is 2.0.5 patched by Marc MERLIN
>on SourceForge. The Python version is 1.5.
>
>I'd like to use the (?!...) negative lookahead assertion, but I'm not
>having much luck. :-(
That version of Python is too old for
At 2002-02-21 16:06 -0800, John W Baxter wrote:
>At 10:23 -0800 2/21/2002, Mike Noyes wrote:
> >It appears that the Python re module is used. Does this mean we can
> >use the Python re module extensions in "Hold posts"?
> >
> >ref.
> >http://www.python.org/doc/current/lib/re-syntax.html
> >http://
At 10:23 -0800 2/21/2002, Mike Noyes wrote:
>It appears that the Python re module is used. Does this mean we can use the
>Python re module extensions in "Hold posts"?
>
>ref.
>http://www.python.org/doc/current/lib/re-syntax.html
>http://py-howto.sourceforge.net/regex/regex.html
You ought to be ab
At 2002-02-20 06:34 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
>What type of regexp does Mailman use in Privacy Options - Hold posts?
I think I found the answer after digging through the code.
It appears that the Python re module is used. Does this mean we can use the
Python re module extensions in "Hold posts"?
What type of regexp does Mailman use in Privacy Options - Hold posts?
BRE POSIX
ERE POSIX
BRE GNU
ERE GNU
Perl
Python
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/content.php?menu=1000&page_id=4
--
28 matches
Mail list logo
