On 29 May 2002 21:06:25 +0200
Nigel Metheringham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 20:56, J C Lawrence wrote:
>> A MIME digest should contain unedited versions of the constituent
>> messages. Why? That way it can be burst back into the discrete
>> messages just as if the subsc
At 11:56 AM 5/29/02, J C Lawrence wrote:
>On Wed, 29 May 2002 08:01:56 -0700
>Bob Weissman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I subscribe to the "SA Talk" list for SpamAssassin discussions in
>> digest mode. When I receive a digest, it shows all the headers in
>> every digested message. So I get loa
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 20:56, J C Lawrence wrote:
> A MIME digest should contain unedited versions of the constituent
> messages. Why? That way it can be burst back into the discrete
> messages just as if the subscriber had received them that way in the
> first place (and is the way digests are a
On Wed, 29 May 2002 08:01:56 -0700
Bob Weissman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I subscribe to the "SA Talk" list for SpamAssassin discussions in
> digest mode. When I receive a digest, it shows all the headers in
> every digested message. So I get loads of List-*, Resent-*,
> Content-Type, etc., e
I subscribe to the "SA Talk" list for SpamAssassin discussions in digest mode. When I
receive a digest, it shows all the headers in every digested message. So I get loads
of List-*, Resent-*, Content-Type, etc., etc. headers in each and every digested
message.
IMHO, Mailman should remove these
