Brad Knowles wrote:
>At 10:36 PM -0700 2006-04-29, William D. Tallman wrote:
>
>
>> Reason I ask is that a simple
>> recompile wasn't exactly addressed in the UPGRADE text, although I did
>> get that I should shut things down while redoing the binaries.
>
At 10:36 PM -0700 2006-04-29, William D. Tallman wrote:
> What happens if I don't 'install'?
Then the existing code doesn't get replaced.
> Do the recompiled execuatbles simply
> remain in the build directory?
Yes.
>
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:54:41PM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> William D. Tallman wrote:
>
> >Is there a canonical method of recompiling Mailman without losing all
> >the entries and data?
>
> configure ; make install
>
> See the UPGRADING document at the top level of the distribution for
> more
William D. Tallman wrote:
>Is there a canonical method of recompiling Mailman without losing all
>the entries and data?
configure ; make install
See the UPGRADING document at the top level of the distribution for
more information.
--
Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gam
Is there a canonical method of recompiling Mailman without losing all
the entries and data?
Thanks,
Bill Tallman
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://ww
