Re: [Mailman-Users] Recipients missing on list post

* Stefan Förster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm not sure if this is better, but if your Python is 2.4 or later, see >> for a patch that can be applied to >> Mailman/Handlers/SMTPDirect.py to produce copious debugging output

Re: [Mailman-Users] Recipients missing on list post

* Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Förster wrote: >> >> Now, 22+26+19+158 equals 225 and not 226 - no rejected mails, no >> NOQUEUE entries. Either Postfix or Mailman is lying. How can I find >> out which one it is, aside from running ngrep/tcpdump? > > > I'm not sure if this is b

Re: [Mailman-Users] Recipients missing on list post

Stefan Förster wrote: > >Now, 22+26+19+158 equals 225 and not 226 - no rejected mails, no >NOQUEUE entries. Either Postfix or Mailman is lying. How can I find >out which one it is, aside from running ngrep/tcpdump? I'm not sure if this is better, but if your Python is 2.4 or later, see

[Mailman-Users] Recipients missing on list post

Hello world, if the host running my Mailman installation is experiencing a high load (i.e., high CPU usage, many CPU cycles waiting for I/O), posts to some lists are sometimes sent out with about 1 in 300 subscribers missing. First of all, I verified that the recipients who didn't receive posts d