Am Sat, 10 Jul 2010 08:09:45 -0700 schriebst du:
> This mail is originally to t...@lists.example2.de and is mapped by
> virtual_alias_maps to the local address 'test' to which Postfix
> appends its cannonical hostname. Thus the mail is mapped to
> t...@example.org
So if i use a list called like t
Am Sat, 10 Jul 2010 07:47:52 -0700 schriebst du:
>> relay_domains = lists.example1.org,lists.example2.org,lists.example3.org
> lists.example1.org,, etc are virtual_alias_domains, not relay_domains.
> Also, it they are in my_destination, they ar not Postfix virtual
> domains at all, they are loc
Am Sat, 10 Jul 2010 08:09:45 -0700 schriebst du:
>> Jul 10 14:04:52 example postfix/pipe[3852]: 38D176D0EC008:
>> to=, orig_to=, relay=dovecot,
>> delay=0.02, delays=0.01/0/0/0.01, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via
>> dovecot service)
>> Jul 10 14:04:52 example postfix/qmgr[32331]: 38D176D0EC0
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010, Mark Sapiro wrote:
newlist li...@lists.example4.org
The above is not correct. In this deprecated newlist usage, the domain
to the right of the '@' is the url host, not the email host so the
equivalent to Franc's command is
newlist li...@example4.org
huh! Well how's tha
Geoff Shang wrote:
>On Sat, 10 Jul 2010, franc walter wrote:
>
>> newlist --urlhost=example4.org --emailhost=lists.example4.org list4
>
>If you have the add_virtual_host items in mm_cfg.py, you should be able to
>just do:
>
>newlist li...@lists.example4.org
The above is not correct. In this depr
franc walter wrote:
>
>When i create a mailinglist on example2.org "test" and if i mail to this
>list, every member should get this mail. But without any error in the logs,
>this mail just gets swallowed by postfix:
>
>This is what i read in mail.log of postfix:
>
>Jul 10 14:20:07 example postfix/l
franc walter wrote:
>
>OK, again, if I have 3 virtual domains on it:
>
>example1.org
>example2.org
>example3.org
>
>and i want to have for each domain a separate list:
>
>list1 on example1.org
>list2 on example2.org
>list3 on example3.org
>
>The emailhost of each of those lists should be like
>
>li
franc walter wrote:
>
>I thought if the packager (Ubuntu in my case) make such a package available,
>i just have to install it and all is well, but it is not like this.
>I have spent many hours till yet to make this work and still it is not
>running.
I agree that that's how it should work, or at
