Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Virus Just Got Through on TOTALLY MODERATED list.

2005-02-04 Thread Brad Knowles
At 1:49 AM -0500 2005-02-04, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: I checked the vette log. The message isn't even in there. Some of the auto-replies to it are (i.e. "message rejected, it's a virus"). And the message shows in the pipermail archives. In that case, are you sure that the message pas

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Virus Just Got Through on TOTALLY MODERATED list.

2005-02-03 Thread Tokio Kikuchi
Hi, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: I saw a lot of people saying "this is why I strip attachments". Mailman 2.1.6 has a nice feature for those who can't strip attachments; the new spam filter 'header_filter_rules' checks attachments' headers recursively. So, messages which have executable attat

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Virus Just Got Through on TOTALLY MODERATED list.

2005-02-03 Thread Dan Mahoney, System Admin
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, David M.Besonen wrote: I just had a small problem. A virus was just sent to all the list members which had spoofed the moderator's email address. No "requires approval" message was sent, despite the fact that everyone (even the moderator) has the "mod" bit set to "on". so what

[Mailman-Users] Re: Virus Just Got Through on TOTALLY MODERATED list.

2005-02-03 Thread David M.Besonen
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:31:19 -0500 (EST), "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I just had a small problem. A virus was just sent to all the list members >which had spoofed the moderator's email address. No "requires approval" >message was sent, despite the fact that everyone

[Mailman-Users] Re: Virus Just Got Through on TOTALLY MODERATED list.

2005-02-03 Thread David M.Besonen
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:31:19 -0500 (EST), "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I just had a small problem. A virus was just sent to all the list members >which had spoofed the moderator's email address. No "requires approval" >message was sent, despite the fact that everyone