On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 04:08:28PM +, Jonathan M wrote:
> More generally, does anyone in the Mailman world have an opinion on
> Mailgun and similar services?
Because Mailgun is US-owned and therefore subject to the Cloud Act,
using Mailgun (or any other US-owned SaaS) may cause GDPR issues.
D
On 7 Dec 2020, at 00:40, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
> Mailman's bounce processing relies on the envelope sender being the
> LISTNAME-bounces address (possibly VERPed. If MailGun does bounce
> processing, it presumably sends the mail with its own envelope sender
> which would preclude Mailman's bounce p
> On 7 Dec 2020, at 14:44, Stephen J. Turnbull
> wrote:
>
> However, it's *possible*
> that Mailgun allows you to set it to something different so you can do
> your own processing. You'd have to check Mailgun docs or ask Mailgun
> about that.
I’ve asked and will report back.
Mailgun does ha
Mark Sapiro writes:
> Mailman's bounce processing relies on the envelope sender being the
> LISTNAME-bounces address (possibly VERPed. If MailGun does bounce
> processing, it presumably sends the mail with its own envelope sender
> which would preclude Mailman's bounce processing
I agree with
On 12/6/20 3:56 PM, Jonathan M wrote:
>
> Is it possible to use Mailgun (or alternative services) with Mailman 2/3?
> Mailgun does its own bounce processing and I wonder how that might tie in
> with Mailman’s.
Both Mailman 2.1 and Mailman 3 have the ability to deliver mail via SMTP
to an exter
