J C Lawrence wrote:
> Some of us use MTA configurations so that we don't need any
> list-specific aliases. Exim is particularly good at this.
Everyone to their own elements (or toys), no?
--
W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
+--
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 12:30:50 -0700
Ashley M Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Moseley wrote:
>> Do people use shell scripts to do all this work?
> Nope, by hand.
Some of us use MTA configurations so that we don't need any
list-specific aliases. Exim is particularly good at this.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 11:18:39AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> At 12:12 PM 11/26/01 -0700, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> >In your virtusertable:
> >
> >#mailing lists
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] test
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]test-admin
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] test-request
> >
Bill Moseley wrote:
> Do people use shell scripts to do all this work?
Nope, by hand.
> su - mailman
> bin/newlist foo
> su
>
> newaliase
>
> makemap hash virtusertable < virtusertable
>
>
> Actually, the problem with that is the bin/newlist should be done last as
> it sends mail to the
At 12:12 PM 11/26/01 -0700, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>In your virtusertable:
>
>#mailing lists
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] test
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]test-admin
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] test-request
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]test-owner
>
>#catchall rule
>@hank.org
Bill Moseley wrote:
> In my virtusertable I have:
>
> @hank.org moseley+%1
>
> So if I have a list [EMAIL PROTECTED], and add aliases
>
> test:"|/home/mailman/mail/wrapper post test"
> test-admin: "|/home/mailman/mail/wrapper mailowner test"
> test-r
