Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Rude response! & I got my subscriber list

2001-04-16 Thread Cordell H. Thomas
I don't think Roger was rude. He just called it the way most of us see it. Del -- Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Rude response!

2001-04-12 Thread Todd Joseph
Can you shead any light on my duplicate message problem? You can be as rude as like with me... :) Seriously, I really need the help... See this link: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2001-April/010634.html -- Mailman-Users maill

[Mailman-Users] Re: Rude response!

2001-04-12 Thread Roger B.A. Klorese
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Arthur J. Byrnes wrote: > The proper response, if you did not ignore the signature file, > like most people do, is to send a private message to the > sender. Ridiculing, someone on a mail list is horrible > conduct. Especially when, the poster is obviously in the middle > of

[Mailman-Users] Re: Rude response!

2001-04-12 Thread Arthur J. Byrnes
At 09:34 AM 4/12/01 -0700, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote: >Most technical lists do not explicitly prohibit advertising, >because it's been well understood on the net for about 20 years >that it's inappropriate in technical forums. Rudeness, although common is certainly worse than the ad. And ruden

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Rude response! & I got my subscriber list

2001-04-12 Thread Philippe Rodriguez
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > My email signature is not an ad. > > Yes, it is. Anything that tells people to come to you for business is an > ad. > > Most technical lists do not explicitly prohibit advertising, because it's > b

[Mailman-Users] Re: Rude response! & I got my subscriber list

2001-04-12 Thread Roger B.A. Klorese
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > My email signature is not an ad. Yes, it is. Anything that tells people to come to you for business is an ad. Most technical lists do not explicitly prohibit advertising, because it's been well understood on the net for about 20 years that it's ina