On Feb 5, 2004, at 5:02 PM, Mark Dadgar wrote:
Cool! I'm a Level 10 Paladin with 115 hit points!
(ok, *now* I'm done)
lightweight. I'd have you killed, but you're not worth the karma points.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
On Feb 5, 2004, at 4:58 PM, Paul H Byerly wrote:
I think the issue for the developers is theory vs. reality. What
is the desired behaviour for the majority of new Mailman lists?
Should not that be the default, with appropriate explanations?
This isn't the answer some will want to hear, bu
hmm. seems the preceding discussion is a good example of why 'reply to
list' could be a bad thing ;-)
reply-to-list is a *configurable* thing, on a per-list basis, without
needing access to anything except a MM list admin interface. I'd hope
system admins of any experience would be able to handle
At 5:02 PM -0800 2004/02/05, Mark Dadgar wrote:
Cool! I'm a Level 10 Paladin with 115 hit points!
If you want to talk about D&D, I do have a number of characters I
could discuss. Which version would you prefer to start with? The
original boxed edition, AD&D, 2nd edition AD&D, or something e
On Feb 5, 2004, at 4:58 PM, Paul H Byerly wrote:
My apologies for bringing it up at all!!
Agreed! My apologies to everyone for posting a cranky note last night
and really getting the ball rolling.
Personally I am very happy with Mailman, and I find most of the
settings easy to unders
On Feb 5, 2004, at 4:27 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
Not to mention a system administrator's worst nightmare...
I am a SAGE Level IV system administrator, with fifteen years of
experience, and I've helped build some of the biggest mail systems on
the planet -- and various other related projects.
Coo
My apologies for bringing it up at all!!
I think the issue for the developers is theory vs. reality. What is
the desired behaviour for the majority of new Mailman lists? Should not
that be the default, with appropriate explanations?
Personally I am very happy with Mailman, and
At 3:23 PM -0800 2004/02/05, Will Yardley wrote:
Not to mention a system administrator's worst nightmare...
I am a SAGE Level IV system administrator, with fifteen years of
experience, and I've helped build some of the biggest mail systems on
the planet -- and various other related projects.
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 02:45:16PM -0800, Mark Dadgar wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2004, at 2:34 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
> > I can go back through the 90's, into the mid-80's if length of time
> >is the important criteria here. I have multiple gigabytes of e-mail
> >on my current system, and untold g
"John Poltorak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is there a way to set it as the default so that new list will be created
> with this setting?
Set in mm_cfg.py ...
# Mailman can be configured to "munge" Reply-To: headers for any passing
# messages. One the one hand,
10 matches
Mail list logo
