Just a quick note to thank all of those who replied to my query.
A lot of good ideas!
Once I get through final exams, I'll try your suggestions.
In addition, I'll send a summary to the mailing list.
Thanks again,
--
Prof Kenneth H Jacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer Science Dept www
> "PB" == Pug Bainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> That's because the world execute bit is still on for that
>> subdir, so they can cd into and look around to their hearts
>> content. Just go ahead and turn that bit off (i.e. make the
>> perms drwxrws---).
PB> The oth
Barry A. Warsaw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something that sounded like:
> That's because the world execute bit is still on for that subdir, so
> they can cd into and look around to their hearts content. Just go
> ahead and turn that bit off (i.e. make the perms drwxrws---).
The other problem is th
> "KJ" == Kenneth Jacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KJ> Is there a way to prohibit local users (with some knowledge of
KJ> Mailman's archive directory structure and naming conventions)
KJ> from seeing the contents of archived files?
KJ> I'd like to continue web-access to th
