> "DG" == David Gibbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DG> Yes, so that begs the question ... why is mailman not
DG> understanding a response from sendmail?
DG> The sendmail that mailman is sending to is 'queueing only'
DG> with no DNS resolution.
It's hard to tell exactly what's
At 04:45 PM 1/22/2003, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
DG> Ordinarily I would agree with you ... but this came from
DG> mailman's smtp mailer, not my sendmail.
Mailman uses your local smtpd to do the sending so it /is/ coming from
your sendmail.
Yes, so that begs the question ... why is mailman n
> "DG" == David Gibbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DG> Ordinarily I would agree with you ... but this came from
DG> mailman's smtp mailer, not my sendmail.
Mailman uses your local smtpd to do the sending so it /is/ coming from
your sendmail.
-Barry
--
Ordinarily I would agree with you ... but this came from mailman's smtp
mailer, not my sendmail.
"Jon Carnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Looks like his mailbox was full (had reached it's specified
> limit/quota). I wouldn't worry about it.
