On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 19:58:54 +0200
Norbert Bollow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No - different UIDs and differend GIDs. None of the mailman
> installations has access rights to other users' data. (Call me
> paranoid on security matters if you wish - some of my customers
> appreciate it :)
Aye,
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:22:19 +0200
> Norbert Bollow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I make an entirely seperate Mailman installation for every
> > customer. This allows patching Mailman for any customer according
> > to their specific needs without risking to break anything for the
> > other
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:22:19 +0200
Norbert Bollow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I make an entirely seperate Mailman installation for every
> customer. This allows patching Mailman for any customer according
> to their specific needs without risking to break anything for the
> other customers. I
> I've thought about both of these and (so far) rejected them because of
> the additional complexity for not much gain. A busy Mailman site will
> gain nothing if there will always be files in the directory the next
> time the runner looks. For a completely idle site, the 1-second sleep
> busy l
> "NB" == Norbert Bollow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It has to do this, or it'll busy loop. I don't know of a good,
>> portable way to wait on new files showing up in a directory.
NB> How about having the process which puts messages into the
NB> queue send a SIGUSR (or w
On Saturday, June 30, 2001, at 03:38 AM, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> How about having the process which puts messages into the queue
> send a SIGUSR (or whatever) signal to qrunner?
Do what biff or INND do. Create a socket somewhere, and when you want to
signal qrunner, write to it. qrunner's idle
> It has to do this, or it'll busy loop. I don't know of a good,
> portable way to wait on new files showing up in a directory.
How about having the process which puts messages into the queue
send a SIGUSR (or whatever) signal to qrunner?
Greetings, Norbert.
--
Norbert Bollow, Weidlistr.18, C
> "B" == Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
B> Thanks for the info on how 2.1's "cron" works... So does it
B> still wait until the next minute to check for messages if it
B> isn't currently processing any, or do they get processed
B> immediately?
In MM2.1, if a particular qrun
On Thursday, June 28, 2001, at 10:48 PM, Alexander Prohorenko wrote:
> I'm not taking caffeine :) Anyway, thanks for advise.
> Actually, I'm just transferring from majordomo to mailman, and majordomo
> processes input queue almost immediatly. I just wanted the same
> effect for mailman.
>
It'
> "AP" == Alexander Prohorenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AP> I'm not taking caffeine :) Anyway, thanks for advise.
AP> Actually, I'm just transferring from majordomo to mailman, and
AP> majordomo processes input queue almost immediatly. I just
AP> wanted the same effect fo
Hey Barry,
Thanks for the info on how 2.1's "cron" works... So does it still wait until the next
minute to check for messages if it isn't currently processing any, or do they get
processed immediately?
Bob
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAI
> "CVR" == Chuq Von Rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CVR> I dunno if this is a typo on Alex's part, but what he said
CVR> was if it comes in at 1:01, it isn't processed until 2:00.
Oops, chalk that up to not believing what I was seeing!
CVR> Now, if you're really saying wait
On Thursday, June 28, 2001, at 09:53 PM, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
>
>> "AP" == Alexander Prohorenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> AP> Now the question is - the posts/subscribes are being processed
> AP> only every minute, not often. So if the message comes at
> AP> 01:01, it'll
> "AP" == Alexander Prohorenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AP> Now the question is - the posts/subscribes are being processed
AP> only every minute, not often. So if the message comes at
AP> 01:01, it'll be visible only at 02:00. Are there any way to
AP> make the messages p
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 04:08:20PM +0300, Alexander Prohorenko wrote:
> Mailman just do nothing with a messages. Can you please advise me what
> should I look
> at to fix this? Thanks.
I've already solved this problem. That was my fault, my missconfiguration.
Now the question is - the posts/s
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 04:08:20PM +0300, Alexander Prohorenko wrote:
> I've got a problem working Mailman. I've installed it properly, everything
> works,
> but nobody can post/subscribe to the list. Ie, I'm subscribing my email
> through the
> web, I'm recieveing a confirmation messages and se
16 matches
Mail list logo
