...dropping the OS issue, which is not on-topic for this list.
At 9:25 PM +0100 3/26/05, Brad Knowles wrote:
>> (To be fair to the Powerbook, I was also asking it to be a laptop at the
>> time. It could not handle heavy-duty web browsing at the same time
>> it was handling peak Mailman loads. Mo
At 12:18 PM -0800 2005-03-26, Heather Madrone wrote:
One of my concerns with Debian is that Python programs tend to be
closely coupled with Python versions. I was concerned that I might
be in a position where I'd be stuck in a version of Debian that wouldn't
work with a new version of Python (
Thank you so much, Derrick. This is exactly the sort of information
I was looking for. Of particular interest was the discussion of exim's
and postfix's configuration, the performance benchmarks, and your
story of running the two MTAs through an underpowered router.
At 8:53 AM -0500 3/26/05, Der
On 3/26/2005 5:53, "Derrick Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fast-forward a couple years to another time I moved, and didn't have
> any network for a week or two. I again made that router my backup MX.
> This time it was running postfix, and I told postfix to accept at most
> 2 simultaneous s
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 11:55:46AM -0800, Heather Madrone wrote:
[...]
| We were going with Debian,
| which then announced that it's dropping sparc support,
Hold up. Debian hasn't announced any such thing. Don't pay attention
to the rumors. Some of the project's leadership *proposed* (notice
t
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 06:31:58PM -0800, John W. Baxter wrote:
| On 3/25/2005 17:12, "Brad Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| > This whole Exim 3/Exim 4 thing is not a problem with postfix.
| > Don't get me wrong, postfix isn't perfect. But what flaws it has
| > tend to be less visible than
