> "DM" == Dan Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DM> Umbrella lists have always confused me, so it wouldn't
DM> surprise me if the List- headers are wrong there. (Not that
DM> I'm responsible for them, but that I have no experience with
DM> umbrella lists.)
FWIW, they've alwa
On Thu, 2002-04-18 at 19:27, Dan Mick wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:54, Tom Neff wrote:
> > I will definitely issue an editing patch for 2.1 when it goes gold. Since
> > this is one of their "we don't think you should WANT to do this"
> > hot-buttons, like controlling the L
> On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:54, Tom Neff wrote:
> I will definitely issue an editing patch for 2.1 when it goes gold. Since
> this is one of their "we don't think you should WANT to do this"
> hot-buttons, like controlling the List-* headers, I don't want to issue
>
> Well, if mai
> "MM" == Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There is a FAQ entry that wants you to hand edit various spool
>> files, but you can patch 2.0.8 to allow message editing.
MM> I think the patch will be necessary for mailman 2.1, it
MM> unfortunately stores the message on
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:54, Tom Neff wrote:
I will definitely issue an editing patch for 2.1 when it goes gold. Since
this is one of their "we don't think you should WANT to do this"
hot-buttons, like controlling the List-* headers, I don't want to issue
Well, if mailman did List
I will definitely issue an editing patch for 2.1 when it goes gold. Since
this is one of their "we don't think you should WANT to do this"
hot-buttons, like controlling the List-* headers, I don't want to issue
patches for prerelease versions and encourage them to do any
counter-engineering.
It's difficult to edit message bodies with encoded MIME parts, although one
can still edit the headers. For plain text messages, I have found the
2.0.8 patch (which simply places headers and body in separate editable
textareas) to be usable. It sure would be nice if someone would make a
bett
> "tneff" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
tneff> I will definitely issue an editing patch for 2.1 when it
tneff> goes gold. Since this is one of their "we don't think you
tneff> should WANT to do this" hot-buttons, like controlling the
tneff> List-* headers, I don't want to
--On Monday, April 15, 2002 4:30 PM -0700 Dan Mick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No one that I'm aware of on the Mailman team is against the
> idea of editing messages in the moderation process.
That's terrific news!
I will issue my patch when 2.1 goes gold.
--
Which "they" do you have in mind?
No one that I'm aware of on the Mailman team is against the
idea of editing messages in the moderation process.
> I will definitely issue an editing patch for 2.1 when it goes gold. Since
> this is one of their "we don't think you should WANT to do this"
> ho
I will definitely issue an editing patch for 2.1 when it goes gold. Since
this is one of their "we don't think you should WANT to do this"
hot-buttons, like controlling the List-* headers, I don't want to issue
patches for prerelease versions and encourage them to do any
counter-engineering.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:55:01AM -0400, Tom Neff wrote:
> "Billie R. McNamara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >We are using version 2.0.8 for a moderated list. But, we aren't able to
> >edit messages before approving them (for example, to delete just one
> >inappropriate word).
> >
> >How can we
"Billie R. McNamara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are using version 2.0.8 for a moderated list. But, we aren't able to
> edit messages before approving them (for example, to delete just one
> inappropriate word).
>
> How can we do this?
There is a FAQ entry that wants you to hand edit various
13 matches
Mail list logo
