Re: [Mailman-Users] Problems with undeliverable mail

2001-12-31 Thread J C Lawrence
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 12:22:16 -0800 Michelle Brownsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I appreciate Graham's suggestion, but after having a good look-see > at Postfix last night, I'm leaning toward giving it a shot. Its an admirable MTA. > However, it might be wise to investigate Exim as well.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problems with undeliverable mail

2001-12-31 Thread J C Lawrence
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 13:40:41 -0500 Graham Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 11:48:21PM -0800, Michelle Brownsworth > wrote: > In your .mc file, > define(`confDELIVERY_MODE', `deferred') > This will stop sendmail from doing DNS queries upon accepting the > mail. It's in

RE: [Mailman-Users] Problems with undeliverable mail

2001-12-31 Thread Richard Idalski
PROTECTED] Cc: Richard Idalski; Graham Dunn Subject: RE: [Mailman-Users] Problems with undeliverable mail >This works, and works well, but If I'm correct also creates an open-relay, >for security reasons this is usually unacceptable. This was the primary >reason I switched to postfix, same

RE: [Mailman-Users] Problems with undeliverable mail

2001-12-31 Thread Richard Idalski
lle Brownsworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 3:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Richard Idalski; Graham Dunn Subject: RE: [Mailman-Users] Problems with undeliverable mail >This works, and works well, but If I'm correct also creates an open-relay, >for securi

RE: [Mailman-Users] Problems with undeliverable mail

2001-12-31 Thread Michelle Brownsworth
ecurity, etc. between the two? .\\ichelle >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Graham Dunn >Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:41 PM >To: Michelle Brownsworth >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Problems w

RE: [Mailman-Users] Problems with undeliverable mail

2001-12-31 Thread Richard Idalski
ECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Graham Dunn Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:41 PM To: Michelle Brownsworth Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Problems with undeliverable mail On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 11:48:21PM -0800, Michelle Brownsworth wrote: > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problems with undeliverable mail

2001-12-31 Thread Graham Dunn
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 11:48:21PM -0800, Michelle Brownsworth wrote: > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: Michelle Brownsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Problems with undeliverable mail > Cc: J C Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problems with undeliverable mail

2001-12-31 Thread J C Lawrence
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001 23:48:21 -0800 Michelle Brownsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, okay... I know when to throw in the towel. :^) I'll > investigate Postfix, with the hope that it's better than > Qmail. > After running it on a server for a couple of years, I don't care > for Qmail

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problems with undeliverable mail

2001-12-31 Thread Michelle Brownsworth
>On Sun, 30 Dec 2001 14:37:08 -0800 >Michelle Brownsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> That makes good sense, Charlie. Only problem is, I don't know how >> to accomplish it in sendmail without enabling >> FEATURE(relay_local_from), something I am loath to do for security >> reasons. Accor

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problems with undeliverable mail

2001-12-30 Thread J C Lawrence
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001 14:37:08 -0800 Michelle Brownsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That makes good sense, Charlie. Only problem is, I don't know how > to accomplish it in sendmail without enabling > FEATURE(relay_local_from), something I am loath to do for security > reasons. According to cf

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problems with undeliverable mail

2001-12-30 Thread Michelle Brownsworth
>On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Michelle Brownsworth wrote: >> >On Thu, 27 Dec 2001 14:06:53 -0800 >> >Michelle Brownsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> My mailhost is chugging away, trying over and over to deliver to a >> >> large batch of addresses with a .gov domain that doesn't resolve;

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problems with undeliverable mail

2001-12-30 Thread Charlie Watts
On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Michelle Brownsworth wrote: > >On Thu, 27 Dec 2001 14:06:53 -0800 > >Michelle Brownsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> My mailhost is chugging away, trying over and over to deliver to a > >> large batch of addresses with a .gov domain that doesn't resolve; > >> this

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problems with undeliverable mail

2001-12-29 Thread Michelle Brownsworth
>On Thu, 27 Dec 2001 14:06:53 -0800 >Michelle Brownsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> My mailhost is chugging away, trying over and over to deliver to a >> large batch of addresses with a .gov domain that doesn't resolve; >> this particular .gov nameserver is obviously having problems. And

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problems with undeliverable mail

2001-12-28 Thread J C Lawrence
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001 14:06:53 -0800 Michelle Brownsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My mailhost is chugging away, trying over and over to deliver to a > large batch of addresses with a .gov domain that doesn't resolve; > this particular .gov nameserver is obviously having problems. And > it's

[Mailman-Users] Problems with undeliverable mail

2001-12-27 Thread Michelle Brownsworth
My mailhost is chugging away, trying over and over to deliver to a large batch of addresses with a .gov domain that doesn't resolve; this particular .gov nameserver is obviously having problems. And it's not from the sendmail's mail queue; /var/spool/mqueue/ is completely empty. It's Mailman