Re: [Mailman-Users] Private archive nightmare with vhosts

2010-02-27 Thread Mark Sapiro
Brian Wilson wrote: > >On Feb 26, 2010, at 7:04 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >> Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >>> Brian Wilson wrote: If i go to archives for a list: http://lists.example.com/pipermail/lists.example.com/test/, the html link that links to listinfo uses DEFAULT_URL_HOST in

Re: [Mailman-Users] Private archive nightmare with vhosts

2010-02-27 Thread Brian Wilson
On Feb 26, 2010, at 7:04 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Mark Sapiro wrote: > >> Brian Wilson wrote: >>> >>> There are a few things I noticed on my install today (Debian w/ Postfix). >>> >>> 1) rmlist doesnt work properly: > > > Fixed by the attached patch. > > >>> 2) Web locations are off... >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Private archive nightmare with vhosts

2010-02-26 Thread Mark Sapiro
Mark Sapiro wrote: >Brian Wilson wrote: >> >>There are a few things I noticed on my install today (Debian w/ Postfix). >> >>1) rmlist doesnt work properly: Fixed by the attached patch. >>2) Web locations are off... >> >>If i go to archives for a list: >>http://lists.example.com/pipermail/li

Re: [Mailman-Users] Private archive nightmare with vhosts

2010-02-26 Thread Mark Sapiro
Brian Wilson wrote: > >First off, thanks for you and Igor for putting together and doing the legwork >on getting the vhost patch working on 2.1.13. I've been wanting to migrate my >lists away from my hosting provider and roll my own mailman install again, but >was waiting on 3.0. Glad this wi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Private archive nightmare with vhosts

2010-02-26 Thread Brian Wilson
> The bottom line for me now is I can take a 2.1.13 base distribution, > patch it with the patch at http://www.msapiro.net/mm/2.1.13_vhost.patch > and patch that with the vhost_extra_patch.txt patch attached to this post, > and I think that list creation and the web interface work. I haven't tes

Re: [Mailman-Users] Private archive nightmare with vhosts

2010-02-01 Thread UGSD
Mark, > I fixed the archiving for both private and public archives so no > rewriting is involved. private.py does the right thing with my > additional patches. I also patched the GetBaseArchiveURL() method to > include the virtual host directory in the public archive URL. > > Finally, I had an is

Re: [Mailman-Users] Private archive nightmare with vhosts

2010-01-31 Thread Mark Sapiro
UGSD wrote: > >After not being able to create a list, I had another issue (not seen in >2.1.7), where the alias file was created in the form of > >lists.domain1.net=list-name-unsubscribe: "|/path/to/mailman unsubscribe >lists.domain1.net=list-name" > >which mailman did not understand and complai

Re: [Mailman-Users] Private archive nightmare with vhosts

2010-01-29 Thread Mark Sapiro
UGSD wrote: > >I got around the DNS issue with /etc/hosts, may not work in your case, i guess Yeah, I can do that too. I've actually created another domain that way, but I havent gotten back to debugging yet. >After not being able to create a list, I had another issue (not seen in >2.1.7), whe

Re: [Mailman-Users] Private archive nightmare with vhosts

2010-01-29 Thread UGSD
Mark, > I made a 2.1.13 vhost patch a little differently. I made a bazaar 2.1.7 > branch, applied the 2.1.7 vhosts patch, committed the result, did a > bzr merge from the 2.1.13 branch which produced 5 conflicts, the only > significant ones being in Mailman/MTA/Utils.py and Mailman/Utils.py, > an

Re: [Mailman-Users] Private archive nightmare with vhosts

2010-01-28 Thread Mark Sapiro
UGSD quoted me and wrote: >> Before you commit too heavily to this, I suggest you look at the first >> 570+ lines at >> >> and see if you really want to be installing a 4 year old release. > >The only reason i chose 2.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Private archive nightmare with vhosts

2010-01-26 Thread UGSD
> Before you commit too heavily to this, I suggest you look at the first > 570+ lines at > > and see if you really want to be installing a 4 year old release. The only reason i chose 2.1.7 is because the patch applied

Re: [Mailman-Users] Private archive nightmare with vhosts

2010-01-26 Thread Mark Sapiro
UGSD wrote: > >First problem that I encountered was the single namespace issue with virtual >domains, so i removed the stock Mailman 2.1.12 that came with Ubuntu, >downloaded Mailman 2.1.7 and patched it with >mailman-2.1.7-release-to-vhost.patch from >http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/stuff/mailman-

[Mailman-Users] Private archive nightmare with vhosts

2010-01-26 Thread UGSD
Hello, I work for a large university and was recently put in charge of consolidating a bunch of mailman lists from multiple domains onto 1 server. First problem that I encountered was the single namespace issue with virtual domains, so i removed the stock Mailman 2.1.12 that came with Ubuntu, d