>Barry Finkel wrote:
>>
>>I ran a test with a test list on my test virtual machine, and this is
>>what is happening. The line in the "-f" file for sync_members
>>
>> bsf-cr...@example.com (New 1 (zzz))
>>
>>is causing all of the succeeding lines in that file to be treated as
>>part of
>Barry Finkel wrote:
>>
>>I ran a test with a test list on my test virtual machine, and this is
>>what is happening. The line in the "-f" file for sync_members
>>
>> bsf-cr...@example.com (New 1 (zzz))
>>
>>is causing all of the succeeding lines in that file to be treated as
>>part of
Barry Finkel wrote:
>
>I ran a test with a test list on my test virtual machine, and this is
>what is happening. The line in the "-f" file for sync_members
>
> bsf-cr...@example.com (New 1 (zzz))
>
>is causing all of the succeeding lines in that file to be treated as
>part of the pare
I wrote:
>>I think I may have uncovered a bug in Mailman 2.1.13. I have not
>>completed my research. I have a script that refreshes the subscriber
>>list via:
>>
>>/usr/lib/mailman/bin/sync_members -w=no -g=no -d=no -a=no \
>> -f /e tc/mailman/generated_lists/LISTNAME LISTNAME
>>
>>where
>>
Barry Finkel wrote:
>I think I may have uncovered a bug in Mailman 2.1.13. I have not
>completed my research. I have a script that refreshes the subscriber
>list via:
>
>/usr/lib/mailman/bin/sync_members -w=no -g=no -d=no -a=no \
> -f /etc/mailman/generated_lists/LISTNAME LISTNAME
>
>where
>
I think I may have uncovered a bug in Mailman 2.1.13. I have not
completed my research. I have a script that refreshes the subscriber
list via:
/usr/lib/mailman/bin/sync_members -w=no -g=no -d=no -a=no \
-f /etc/mailman/generated_lists/LISTNAME LISTNAME
where
/etc/mailman/generated_l
