Peter Kofod wrote:
>Any thoughts on what it means when the process is in a wa (wait?) state as
>opposed to id (idle?). I am wondering if there is some type of thread
>blocking (I am not a developer, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last
>night). Just wondering out aloud. Am I on to so
At 5:22 PM -0500 10/29/06, Peter Kofod wrote:
> I wouldn't even have started looking in to it if it wasn't that the
> system was so unresponsive.
That's not unusual. Most systems get completely ignored unless there
is some sort of catastrophic problem.
> It literally took 20 minutes to get
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 10/29/2006 4:01 PM
To: Peter Kofod; mailman-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Performance on mailman
At 11:26 AM -0500 10/29/06, Peter Kofod wrote:
> My blocks in (bi) and swap in (si) seem very high compared to what the
> FAQ says. Furtherm
At 11:26 AM -0500 10/29/06, Peter Kofod wrote:
> My blocks in (bi) and swap in (si) seem very high compared to what the
> FAQ says. Furthermore, It looks like a lot of the processes are in a
> wait state (far right), if I read this correctly.
The Linux box you are comparing to in that FAQ en
Sapiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 8:05 PM
To: Peter Kofod; mailman-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Performance on mailman
Peter Kofod wrote:
>I am doing something wrong. I am running mailman with about 100 lists
>(announce only). A couple are pret
Peter Kofod wrote:
>I am doing something wrong. I am running mailman with about 100 lists
>(announce only). A couple are pretty big (40K + addresses). They,
>however, are used infrequently. The big list has one weekly mailing and
>the others much less often. Currently, there is NO mail queued
I am doing something wrong. I am running mailman with about 100 lists
(announce only). A couple are pretty big (40K + addresses). They,
however, are used infrequently. The big list has one weekly mailing and
the others much less often. Currently, there is NO mail queued or being
sent (tail -f
