J.A. Terranson wrote:
>
>On Fri, 15 May 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> >Am i safe setting to off and then deleting this garbage?
>>
>>
>> You can delete any of it at any time. The worst that happens is someone
>> has saved a digest with a link that no longer works. If you actually
>> have no diges
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> >Am i safe setting to off and then deleting this garbage?
>
>
> You can delete any of it at any time. The worst that happens is someone
> has saved a digest with a link that no longer works. If you actually
> have no digest members, this is not a proble
J.A. Terranson wrote:
>
>On Fri, 15 May 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>> Yes. These are the attachments (or html parts) that were scrubbed from
>> the plain text digest and stored and replaced by links to the content
>> in the digest. The only way to avoid this is to set the list(s)
>> digestable at
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> J.A. Terranson wrote:
> >
> > I have a long running MM with three public lists in it. One of
> >them is archived, and two of them are not. i noticed today that the
> >*non-archived* lists have attachments stored (gigs of them) under:
> >
> >~mail
J.A. Terranson wrote:
>
> I have a long running MM with three public lists in it. One of
>them is archived, and two of them are not. i noticed today that the
>*non-archived* lists have attachments stored (gigs of them) under:
>
>~mailman/logs/archives.old//attachments///attachment.html
>
Greetings, Redux. :-)
I have a long running MM with three public lists in it. One of
them is archived, and two of them are not. i noticed today that the
*non-archived* lists have attachments stored (gigs of them) under:
~mailman/logs/archives.old//attachments///attachment.html
It do
