Re: [Mailman-Users] Non-subscribers defeating the generic non-member action

Mark: About the list's accept_these_non-members, I have ten email address that I put there for people who want to send from multiple emails but only want to receive posts at one of those addresses. None of them resemble the problem address. I'll do the testing you suggest and report what I

Re: [Mailman-Users] Non-subscribers defeating the generic non-member action

Mark: Thank you for this info. I'll see if I have access to archives/private/LIST.mbox/List.mbox. To answer your question, I made a mistake in the regex (it's been years since messing with those little darlings). I actually blocked the spoofed email by putting "t...@mydomain.org" in the "di

Re: [Mailman-Users] Non-subscribers defeating the generic non-member action

Robert Boyd Skipper wrote: > > About the list's accept_these_non-members, I have ten email address that > I put there for people who want to send from multiple emails but only > want to receive posts at one of those addresses. None of them resemble > the problem address. As long as they are add

Re: [Mailman-Users] Non-subscribers defeating the generic non-member action

Robert Boyd Skipper wrote: > > Thank you for this info. I'll see if I have access to > archives/private/LIST.mbox/List.mbox. If you don't have direct access to the file on host, you can get it via the web with a URL like . This works w

Re: [Mailman-Users] Non-subscribers defeating the generic non-member action

Robert Boyd Skipper wrote: > > I've been running lists for years, and the filtering has been pretty > good at blocking posts from non-members. But recently, there have been > some leaks, allowing non-member spammers to slip a message onto the > list. The first time this happened, it turned out t

[Mailman-Users] Non-subscribers defeating the generic non-member action

I've been running lists for years, and the filtering has been pretty good at blocking posts from non-members. But recently, there have been some leaks, allowing non-member spammers to slip a message onto the list. The first time this happened, it turned out to be due to non-alphanumeric cha