On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 06:04:35PM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> William D. Tallman wrote:
> >
> >Setting up a web interface won't be something I'll do, as the ISP has
> >the page, not me. No open ports and behind a NATing router/modem :)
>
>
> For all but very large scale lists, it is much easier
William D. Tallman wrote:
>
>Setting up a web interface won't be something I'll do, as the ISP has
>the page, not me. No open ports and behind a NATing router/modem :)
For all but very large scale lists, it is much easier to administer the
lists via the web interface. You don't have to open a po
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 05:05:48PM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Aha! That's what I was hoping to hear. Saved your response, and will
send majordomo->/dev/null. Hello, Mailman!
Setting up a web interface won't be something I'll do, as the ISP has
the page, not me. No open ports and behind a NATi
William D. Tallman
>
>Is it possible to run a server behind a gateway and through an ISP?
Yes.
>Fetchmail can service list mailboxes easily enough, and Sendmail can do
>transport duty both ways. But in order that my machine's hostname is
>not carried beyond the gateway, I have to use the Sendm
I'm subscribed here to get some answers about email list software in
general, and hopefully some continuing questions about Mailman in
particular. So I may be gone shortly, depending on what I discover
here.
I am considering setting up an email list server for possibly more than
one local email d
