I guess I was just trying to keep things as separate as possible. I
can't think of a good reason not to set it up as you describe, and it
might work better that way. The end result should be the same, since
the actual Mailman installations are still separate.
I still don't understand why, since
Dave Melton wrote:
> I've now got my second installation of Mailman almost working, with
> a username and group of "mailmana" (mailmanb and mailmanc will happen
> as soon as I get the first one working).
Any reason why you're using different UID.GID combinations, instead of the
default mailman.
First, thanks to Roger for the tip about setting up my VirtualHosts!
I've now got my second installation of Mailman almost working, with
a username and group of "mailmana" (mailmanb and mailmanc will happen
as soon as I get the first one working). The installation was no
problem, I was able to
