On 06/05/2014 08:45 PM, Steve Matzura wrote:
>
> OH no, it can do that all right, but it's a little odd in how it does
> it. Instead of putting both addresses in the "To" field, it puts the
> author in "To" and the mailing list in "CC". I just use the regular
> reply and change the address, pointi
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:13:30 -0500, you wrote:
>On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 12:43 -0400, Steve Matzura wrote:
>> This reply mechanism is driving me a little weird--the reply function
>> sends the messages to their individual authors, not the list. I hope
>> I'm not breeching etiquette by redirecting my
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 12:43 -0400, Steve Matzura wrote:
> This reply mechanism is driving me a little weird--the reply function
> sends the messages to their individual authors, not the list. I hope
> I'm not breeching etiquette by redirecting my reply to the list.
Not at all! Most mail user agen
This reply mechanism is driving me a little weird--the reply function
sends the messages to their individual authors, not the list. I hope
I'm not breeching etiquette by redirecting my reply to the list.
Thanks, Mark, for your cogent and complete reply.
The short answer and good thing about all o
On 06/05/2014 04:27 AM, Steve Matzura wrote:
> I'm ready for the next step, which is to
> move an entire configuration and mail spool from an old Debian
> 5+Mailman 2.1.11 server.
>
> I imagine the spool (/var) files can just be tar'd and moved en masse.
Yes and no. You do not want to move the l
Thanks to Steve Turnbull's help and some intelligent manual-reading, I
have successfully built and installed version 2.1.18-1 on a Debian 7
(Wheezy) system. check_perms reports no problems, `version' reports
the right version number, I'm ready for the next step, which is to
move an entire configura
