Mark Sapiro napisał(a):
> Dominika Tkaczyk wrote:
>>
>>What if I did as you suggested first, but instead of one filter rule that
>>matches everything, there would be one filter rule for each address I want
>>held (I assume that there won't be more than 4-5 such subscribers), and such
>>a rule w
Dominika Tkaczyk wrote:
>
>What if I did as you suggested first, but instead of one filter rule that
>matches everything, there would be one filter rule for each address I want
>held (I assume that there won't be more than 4-5 such subscribers), and such
>a rule would match a From: header with th
Hello,
Mark Sapiro napisał(a):
> Patrick Bogen wrote:
>
>>Unfortunately, it looks like, since Moderate.py comes before anything
>>else, there's no really 'correct' way to do this.
>
>
> It doesn't come before SpamDetect which processes header_filter_rules,
> so your suggestion below won't
Patrick Bogen wrote:
>On 12/1/06, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> It doesn't come before SpamDetect which processes header_filter_rules,
>> so your suggestion below won't work.
>
>Indeed, this is correct. I think I failed at reading, since
>Moderate.py isn't anything like the first in
On 12/1/06, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patrick Bogen wrote:
>
> >Unfortunately, it looks like, since Moderate.py comes before anything
> >else, there's no really 'correct' way to do this.
>
>
> It doesn't come before SpamDetect which processes header_filter_rules,
> so your suggestion
Patrick Bogen wrote:
>Unfortunately, it looks like, since Moderate.py comes before anything
>else, there's no really 'correct' way to do this.
It doesn't come before SpamDetect which processes header_filter_rules,
so your suggestion below won't work.
>One option that ought to work, however, wo
On 11/30/06, Patrick Bogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/30/06, Dominika Tkaczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My second question is: does Mailman use any email authorization or it simply
> > checks the From: header of messages?
> Mailman only checks the From header, but it also looks for a s
On 11/30/06, Dominika Tkaczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like my mailing list to have the following configuration: the
> messages from most of subscribers are rejected, and there are a few
> subscribers whose messages are hold for moderation. Is there any way to do
> so without changing t
Hello,
I would like my mailing list to have the following configuration: the
messages from most of subscribers are rejected, and there are a few
subscribers whose messages are hold for moderation. Is there any way to do
so without changing the source code? Or maybe there are already some
patc
