Rob Lingelbach wrote:
>could the following be directly related to the toggle between MIME digests and
>plain-text ones?
It almost certainly is.
>1) Yet I just looked at this particular user's celphone (Android) message
>queue, (he subscribes to the digest) and saw that the digests he's getti
could the following be directly related to the toggle between MIME digests and
plain-text ones?
(herewith the question)
I've been using mailman for a very long time, since I migrated from SmartList
maybe 12 years ago.
I have a multi-question topic that takes a few questions and combines them
rpsch...@knology.net wrote:
>Just tried:
>image/vnd.adobe.photoshop
>
>as suggested. Still did not work. How do you look at the raw message to see
>what the Content_type: header for the attached
>part says it will be?
It depends on your mail client, but often it is something like "view
messa
Just tried:
image/vnd.adobe.photoshop
as suggested. Still did not work. How do you look at the raw message to see
what the Content_type: header for the attached
part says it will be?
What is the mime type of a psd file? I have tried
:
application/octet-stream
Kimberli Tompkins wrote:
>
>This is the message that appears in the archive just above the
>attachment link
>
>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>Name: Lab Contact List 09-11-08.xls
>Type: application/msexcel
>Size: 31232 bytes
>Desc: not available
application/msexcel is not a registered mime
This a new problem for this list. It used to save the excel file in the
archives with the correct .xls extension. but now it is getting a .bin
extension. All excel MIME types have been added to the filters. All
other attachments seem to be saving correctly.
This is the message that appears in the
Butting in here where I probably don't belong (I'm speaking here more as a
mailing list end user than as a list administrator) but as simple as that wish
is, it ain't gonna happen. I subscribe to a number of mailing lists, some of
them mailman powered, some of them lyris-powered and some of them
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Ryan Steele wrote:
>
>
>> Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>>> Ryan Steele wrote:
>>>
>>>
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Do you have convert_html_to_plaintext set to Yes?
>
>
>
Affirmative, I do.
Ryan Steele wrote:
>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> Ryan Steele wrote:
>>
>>> Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>>
Do you have convert_html_to_plaintext set to Yes?
>>> Affirmative, I do.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Based on what I see, I don't think that is the problem.
It definitely IS the issu
At 4:37 PM -0500 3/2/07, Ryan Steele wrote:
> It appears the client who got a copy of the pre-garbled message uses
> Eudora (I didn't know people still used Eudora ^_^),
I've been using Eudora since the version 1.x days.
> so I've sent him
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Ryan Steele wrote:
>
>> I'm not even sure it's possible in
>> Outlook to get this information (I researched/looked for a little while
>> to no avail)
>>
>
> In Outlook Express, you get the message properties from the File menu
> or by right-clicking the message in the
Ryan Steele wrote:
>
>I'm not even sure it's possible in
>Outlook to get this information (I researched/looked for a little while
>to no avail)
In Outlook Express, you get the message properties from the File menu
or by right-clicking the message in the list of messages pane and
selecting proper
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Ryan Steele wrote:
>
>> Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>>> It is possible that something in Mailman's MimeDel (content filtering)
>>> is misrepresenting the character set and causing utf-8 encoded text to
>>> be declared as some other character set, but it could also be
>>> some
Ryan Steele wrote:
>
>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>> It is possible that something in Mailman's MimeDel (content filtering)
>> is misrepresenting the character set and causing utf-8 encoded text to
>> be declared as some other character set, but it could also be
>> something else.
>
>Sounds like a fair
Ryan Steele wrote:
>
>Recently, messages from AOL ( shudder, X-Mailer: AOL WebMail 23823 in
>one example I'm viewing ) and Outlook ( shudder, Build 11.0.5510 in one
>example I'm viewing ) have been sending multipart messages which appear
>to confuse the Mailman MimeDel ( X-Content-Filtered-By: M
Hey folks.
Recently, messages from AOL ( shudder, X-Mailer: AOL WebMail 23823 in
one example I'm viewing ) and Outlook ( shudder, Build 11.0.5510 in one
example I'm viewing ) have been sending multipart messages which appear
to confuse the Mailman MimeDel ( X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeD
At 8:20 PM +0200 2005-08-31, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 8:33 AM -0700 2005-08-31, Donald Wong wrote:
>
>> The Problem:
>> When trying to send a digitally signed (SSL cert) email to a Mailman
>> list, using Mozilla Thunderbird in this case, the recipients on the list
>> would see the signatu
At 8:33 AM -0700 2005-08-31, Donald Wong wrote:
> The Problem:
> When trying to send a digitally signed (SSL cert) email to a Mailman
> list, using Mozilla Thunderbird in this case, the recipients on the list
> would see the signature as Not Valid.
This is a known problem. See
Is it possible to make mailman leave the entire content of a message
with untouched (example, multipart MIME messages)
The Problem:
When trying to send a digitally signed (SSL cert) email to a Mailman
list, using Mozilla Thunderbird in this case, the recipients on the list
would see the signatu
Judy Petersen wrote:
>It appears that two of our list members are suddenly receiving their digests
>in MIME format. I read a message about it that suggested AOL was doing this
>and the user has an AOL address so I referred her. Seems AOL says they don't
>cause any changes to these emails (what I e
It appears that two of our list members are suddenly receiving their digests
in MIME format. I read a message about it that suggested AOL was doing this
and the user has an AOL address so I referred her. Seems AOL says they don't
cause any changes to these emails (what I expected them to say).
Any
Hello -
I downloaded the Mailman 2.1.2 tarball yesterday, and ran into an issue
with a virus scan. McAfee commandline virus scan found
Exploit-MIME.gen, a generic MIME format "virus" that exploits the
"Microsoft Incorrect MIME Header vulnerability". I downloaded the
source tarball yesterday, and
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 15:23:35 -0500
odd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello ... I want to know if it is possible to se the actual
> attachments in the archive ...
See the FAQ:
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
--
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscillate
Hello ...
I want to know if it is possible to se the actual attachments in the archive ...
For example ... when i attach a picture to the mail, I want to be able to download it
from the archive or even better , I could see it on the archive page ... Is this
possible ?
Now I just see some usel
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Chad Rebuck wrote:
> I chose to use stripmime: http://www.phred.org/~alex/stripmime.html.
> There are some aol 6.0 users that post the list I host and I see =20 at
> the end of the lines in the pipermail archive. Maybe this would be
> handled better with another tool? Those
Could anyone share their opinion on which mime/html removal tool works
best? There are a few listed in the mailman faq
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=all#1.8
I chose to use stripmime: http://www.phred.org/~alex/stripmime.html.
There are some aol 6.0 users that post the list I h
I can not find a way to make mime messages in the
digest apear as plain text like the other messages.
Is there a way? Also does anyone know if MonArch handles this if Mailman does
not?
Looking at sourceforge it looks like this might be
a upcomming feature of 2.1 is this correct?
Thanks
Good Morning:
I get daily batches of mail from the Mailman at Compostcouncil. They come in
MIME but I can't open them.
My Adobe Acrobat tries but fails.
I run Windows 98 on a Dell.
Do you have any suggestions?
Thanks, sorry for the bother.
===
Peter J. Smith
{775} 882-9
> Has anyone know if there is any chance the mailman web archives will ever
> understand mime?
Experimental pre-features are available in 2.1 now. It's a long
way from polished, but the ideas are interesting. Go browse
Sourceforge CVS for Scrubber.py if you're interested.
---
Has anyone know if there is any chance the mailman web archives will ever
understand mime?
Con Wieland
UC Irvine
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
I have a user on a list that has a corporate policy with turns plain text
messages into MIME with HTML attachments to outgoing mail server. Is
there a way to increase the tolerance of Mailman so it cat get past MIME
headers to look at commands going to the admin address.
I do not want to extend
While setting up a test list with the current release version
of Mailman, I got a complaint from a user saying that he could
not subscribe to the list.
The transcript follows:
This is an automated response.
There were problems with the email commands you sent to Mailman via
the administrative
Jeff Dairiki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something that sounded like:
> >> Does anyone know of a good Mime Stripper that can work with the
> >> latest Sendmail?
> Also note I've posted a de-Miming patch for Mailman. (SourceForge
> patch #413752.) See:
Btw, thank you for this. I installed the othe
> CR == Clayton, Robert [2001-5-1]
CR> Does anyone know of a good Mime Stripper that can work with the
CR> latest Sendmail?
Don't know if it helps: I've written a filter which expects a MIME
compliant message on stdin and outputs a MIME compliant message on
stdout, stripping only the parts
>Robert Clayton wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know of a good Mime Stripper that can work with the
>> latest Sendmail?
Also note I've posted a de-Miming patch for Mailman. (SourceForge
patch #413752.) See:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=413752&group_id=103&atid=300103
Jeff
-
The emails ARE sent in the TO: field - so I am not sure why it gives this
error.
Any ideas?
James
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of J C Lawrence
Sent: 01 May 2001 17:22
To: Clayton, Robert
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mim
On Tue, 1 May 2001 07:20:27 -0400
Robert Clayton wrote:
> Does anyone know of a good Mime Stripper that can work with the
> latest Sendmail?
demime is the usual tool used:
http://scifi.squawk.com/demime.html
stripmime is another contender:
http://www.phred.org/~alex/stripmime.html
--
Clayton, Robert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something that sounded like:
> Does anyone know of a good Mime Stripper that can work with the latest Sendmail?
The one I am using, which should work with any sendmail, is at:
http://www.phred.org/~alex/stripmime.html
The only problem with this, until I
Does anyone know of a good Mime Stripper that can work with the latest Sendmail?
It would be for a Solaris 2.8 system.
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:52:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there a way to have binary attachments not encoded in the list
> archives?
Not with pipermail, the default archiver.
If you change archivers, then yes.
See the docs and this list archives for answers to your question.
Marc
Is there a way to have binary attachments not encoded in the list
archives?
(a link to the file would be easier for people browsing through the
archives)
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.python.org/mailman/listinfo/m
41 matches
Mail list logo