ok would the postfix file main.cf be like this
inet_interfaces = 172.31.101.70, 127.0.0.1
Brian
On Tuesday 08 June 2004 07:32, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 11:30 PM -0400 2004-06-07, Brian York wrote:
> > Would their be any performance loss by having mailman send through the
> > ip address of eth0
At 11:30 PM -0400 2004-06-07, Brian York wrote:
Would their be any performance loss by having mailman send through the ip
address of eth0 instead of the loopback?
Using eth0 instead of lo0 will result in real packets being
generated and sent out the interface, and then coming back in. This
co
At 5:22 PM -0400 2004-06-05, Brian York wrote:
Their is nothing else that postfix has put in the maillog besides
just repeats
of that.
That's all incoming mail. There's got to be outgoing mail being
handled somewhere. You've got to find where that is and compare the
MTA logs on that system
Figured this out. I have postfix setup to accept connection on the ip address
of eth0 and when i copied the config files from the test server to the new
one i didn't setup the host file. Which had the dns name pointing back to the
loopback instead of the real ip address.
Would their be any per
maillog:
Jun 4 16:31:29 listserv postfix/smtpd[27973]: connect from
unknown[172.31.101.4]
Jun 4 16:31:29 listserv postfix/smtpd[27973]: ACE50337E2:
client=unknown[172.31.101.4]
Jun 4 16:31:29 listserv postfix/cleanup[27975]: ACE50337E2:
message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jun 4 16:31:29 listserv
Their is nothing else that postfix has put in the maillog besides just repeats
of that.
Brian
(i sent this to the list but never got the message. Sorry if its a repeat)
On Friday 04 June 2004 18:52, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 6:38 PM -0400 2004/06/04, Brian York wrote:
> > maillog:
> > Jun 4
At 6:38 PM -0400 2004/06/04, Brian York wrote:
maillog:
Jun 4 16:31:29 listserv postfix/smtpd[27973]: connect from
unknown[172.31.101.4]
Jun 4 16:31:29 listserv postfix/smtpd[27973]: ACE50337E2:
client=unknown[172.31.101.4]
Jun 4 16:31:29 listserv postfix/cleanup[27975]: ACE50337E2:
messa
At 4:46 PM -0400 2004/06/04, Brian York wrote:
i have messages held in qfiles/shunt/ directory and qfiles/retry/ and i am
getting this error in log/mailman/
Jun 04 16:41:03 2004 (27520) delivery to [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed
with code -1: (111, 'Connection refused')
Anyone know what is causing t
i have messages held in qfiles/shunt/ directory and qfiles/retry/ and i am
getting this error in log/mailman/
Jun 04 16:41:03 2004 (27520) delivery to [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed
with code -1: (111, 'Connection refused')
Anyone know what is causing this?
Thanks
Brian
---
