Re: [Mailman-Users] Memory usage climbs for 3rd and 4th outgoing qrunner process

On 8/24/2011 7:59 PM, Ivan Fetch wrote: > > I've let things run, and although there is still some growth, the box has not > hit 97% (of 2Gb) memory usage like it did once before. But the question is when the box is at 97% memory utilization, how much of that memory is actually needed vs. inact

Re: [Mailman-Users] Memory usage climbs for 3rd and 4th outgoingqrunner process

Hi Mark, On Aug 22, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Ivan Fetch wrote: >> >> I am curious what would cause an outgoing queue runner process to increase >> in memory usage, when Mailman is idle? > > > [...] >> >> Even when Mailman is idle and not processing messages, the memory usage fo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Memory usage climbs for 3rd and 4th outgoingqrunner process

Ivan Fetch wrote: > >I am curious what would cause an outgoing queue runner process to increase in >memory usage, when Mailman is idle? [...] > >Even when Mailman is idle and not processing messages, the memory usage for >the fourth outgoing runner process remains at 200Mb and continues to rise

[Mailman-Users] Memory usage climbs for 3rd and 4th outgoing qrunner process

Hello, I am curious what would cause an outgoing queue runner process to increase in memory usage, when Mailman is idle? I am running 4 outgoing qrunner slices, using this in mm_cfg.py: try: QRUNNERS.remove(('OutgoingRunner', 1)) QRUNNERS.append(('OutgoingRunner', 4)) except ValueError:

Re: [Mailman-Users] Memory usage

On 12/5/07, Grigory Batalov wrote: > The problem is that some qrunners quickly eat memory. Most of them > use 20-37Mb after 13 hours of running. But today several qrunners > 6 times took above 200Mb! Fortunately now I have Monit that checks > memory usage, and kills such runners. I'm reas

Re: [Mailman-Users] Memory usage

On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 13:19:16 -0600, Brad Knowles wrote: > > It was 25Mb maximum in my previous letter, now it is 36Mb: > > > > $ top > >PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND > > 17660 mailman 15 0 101M 36M 2668 S 0.0 1.8 0:41.33 qrunner > > 32356 mail

Re: [Mailman-Users] Memory usage

On 12/4/07, Grigory Batalov wrote: >> See >> . > > Sorry, not much help. > Can you explain me, why qrunners take more and more memory (RES)? You seem to have fewer lists and fewer numbers of members per list than some of

Re: [Mailman-Users] Memory usage

On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 20:14:14 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >I would like to know, is it possible to reduce qrunners memory usage and how? > >There are 150 lists on the site and about 800 subscribers maximum. > > See > . Sorry,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Memory usage

Grigory Batalov wrote: > >I would like to know, is it possible to reduce qrunners memory usage and how? >There are 150 lists on the site and about 800 subscribers maximum. See . -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>The h

[Mailman-Users] Memory usage

Hi! Mailman qrunners eat a lot of memory on my site: USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND mailman 30263 0.0 0.6 80108 13520 ?S02:20 0:01 /usr/bin/python /usr/share/mailman/bin/qrunner --runner=VirginRunner:0:1 mailman 30584 0.0 0.7 82252

Re: [Mailman-Users] Memory usage

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James, > What can I do to decrease or limit the memory mailman uses whilst > running? I don't particularly mind if this comes at the expense of > performance. I seem to recall one of the recent point releases greatly reducing the amount of memory my

[Mailman-Users] Memory usage

Many thanks for the help with my previous problem. During the last run of posting to my large list my server crashed due to lack of memory. I thought this was due to a change to the exim configuration I'd made but observations on today's run indicate that it was mailman's python process taking up a