Just for the record. I had our sysadmin make the changes suggested below and
it worked perfectly even on existing lists. GUI preference setup would be
nice but at least I can now change the default user count.
Thanks to all.
Eli
On 6/8/06, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Eli Tuber" <
John W. Baxter wrote:
>
>However, we need to remember that we got to where we are because people
>didn't like the old (1.0.x) way of doing this. The page size choice might
>have been the better way to fix that.
Thanks for the history John. So far, nothing has been done towards an
implementation,
On 6/9/06 5:10 PM, "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like the latter idea which would allow, in the example of chunk size
> = 30, for a list of 31 to 60 members to be displayed in two pages
> rather than 20 or more. This can make it more difficult to find a
> particular member in a larg
Eli Tuber wrote:
>I actually like the idea that the user can control the breakdown size and
>the amount of members that are listed per page. Personally as long as the
>list is sorted finding the users should not be very hard on a moderate size
>list.
>
>This is my first time posting on this users
I actually like the idea that the user can control the breakdown size and
the amount of members that are listed per page. Personally as long as the
list is sorted finding the users should not be very hard on a moderate size
list.
This is my first time posting on this users group. What would it tak
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> I prefer however to think in terms of the RFEs on this which ask for
> various things from simply exposing the parameter in the web
> interface to providing a radio button selection (e.g. 20, 50, 100,
> all) on the pages to paginat
In a flurry of recycled electrons, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> I prefer however to think in terms of the RFEs on this which ask for
> various things from simply exposing the parameter in the web interface
> to providing a radio button selection (e.g. 20, 50, 100, all) on the
> pages to paginating without
John W. Baxter wrote:
>
>I always worry about changing default values, but in this case the world has
>changed. Is 25 still the right default in this age when few list
>owner/admin folks are on dialup? Just one more thing to contemplate.
Actually, the distributed default is 30, but your point i
On 6/8/06 6:50 PM, "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eli Tuber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 21:38:08 -0400
> To: mailman-users@python.org
>
>> Is there a way to not change over to alphabetical view of the members list
>> once it has over N number of users? I have
Eli Tuber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 21:38:08 -0400
To: mailman-users@python.org
>Is there a way to not change over to alphabetical view of the members list
>once it has over N number of users? I have about 25 emails and would rather
>see them all in one page then broken do
Is there a way to not change over to alphabetical view of the members list
once it has over N number of users? I have about 25 emails and would rather
see them all in one page then broken down by letters. It makes it easier
when I have to disable a couple of users from receiving an email and then
t
11 matches
Mail list logo
