At 6:01 PM +0100 2006-02-06, Xabier Guitián wrote:
> I've checked every log and find what i was looking for, the logs tells us the
> message-id I want to look after, it divides in different MTA IDs, i'm
> supposing that MM sorts them somehow.
Once the message has passed from Mailman to
Xabier Guitián wrote:
>
>I've checked every log and find what i was looking for, the logs tells us the
>message-id I want to look after, it divides in different MTA IDs, i'm
>supposing that MM sorts them somehow. With that I can search across the logs
>looking for the specific "list member" i wante
Hi!
I've checked every log and find what i was looking for, the logs tells us the
message-id I want to look after, it divides in different MTA IDs, i'm
supposing that MM sorts them somehow. With that I can search across the logs
looking for the specific "list member" i wanted to track. That's w
Xabier Guitián wrote:
>How we can check that a message was sent to the entire list if some of the
>members didn't received that mail? Is the sending process controlled by the
>MTA or directly by mailman? Is there any log where i can check every mail
>sended by mailman like the "mail.log" from the
Xabier Guitián, Montag, 6. Februar 2006 11:41:
> How we can check that a message was sent to the entire list if
> some of the members didn't received that mail? Is the sending
> process controlled by the MTA or directly by mailman? Is there
> any log where i can check every mail sended by mailman
How we can check that a message was sent to the entire list if some of the
members didn't received that mail? Is the sending process controlled by the
MTA or directly by mailman? Is there any log where i can check every mail
sended by mailman like the "mail.log" from the MTA?
I'm using Postfix a
