On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 14:12, Bob Franklin wrote:
> What I'm unsure about is what should be done with this list - should it be
> configured in a certain way or whatever? I guess it's just required so
> Mailman can have a valid sending address and can capture bounces, etc. in
> the usual way.
Righ
At 19:12 20/03/2003, Bob Franklin wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Kory Wheatley wrote:
> I just upgraded to mailman 2.1.1 from mailman 2.0.13. The lists and
> everything converted fine and the web server displays everything
> properly. The problem I'm having is when I startup "mailmanctl" I get
> the
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Kory Wheatley wrote:
> I just upgraded to mailman 2.1.1 from mailman 2.0.13. The lists and
> everything converted fine and the web server displays everything
> properly. The problem I'm having is when I startup "mailmanctl" I get
> the following error "Site list is missing mai
I just upgraded to mailman 2.1.1 from mailman 2.0.13. The lists and
everything converted fine and the web server displays everything
properly. The problem I'm having is when I startup "mailmanctl"
I get the following error "Site list is missing mailman". What is
configured wrong to cause thi
