Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman speed

--On Thursday, July 8, 2004 9:33 pm +0200 Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Of course it does! The whole point of the recipe is to deliver Mailman like VERP without the overhead in handoff of messages from Mailman to the MTA. But you've got to make sure that the VERP format is the s

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman speed

At 5:43 PM +0100 2004-07-08, Ian A B Eiloart wrote: Anyway, exim won't be queueing mail AFTER doing the VERP. Only the un-VERPED message gets queued. Which is the point. Doing the VERP in Mailman means that multiple messages would get queued, one for each recipient. If you queue the message

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman speed

--On Thursday, July 8, 2004 5:36 pm +0200 Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 3:52 PM +0100 2004-07-08, Ian A B Eiloart wrote: The MTA does need to VERP remote deliveries, and that means making callouts to remote machines for each recipient. However, exim will use a single connection f

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman speed

At 3:52 PM +0100 2004-07-08, Ian A B Eiloart wrote: The MTA does need to VERP remote deliveries, and that means making callouts to remote machines for each recipient. However, exim will use a single connection for each remote host - rather than one per recipient. So, exim has to send the data s

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman speed

--On Thursday, July 8, 2004 3:26 pm +0200 Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 11:18 AM +0100 2004-07-08, Ian A B Eiloart wrote: You can let the MTA do the VERP for you. That is faster than letting mailman do it. That may be true for

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman speed

At 11:18 AM +0100 2004-07-08, Ian A B Eiloart wrote: You can let the MTA do the VERP for you. That is faster than letting mailman do it. That may be true for Exim, but perhaps not for other MTAs. Assuming that's true, it's still going to slow do

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman speed

ort, the answer is "maybe". So I guess if we use a fast MTA and turn off VERP, we will get a system that is equally fast or even faster. You can let the MTA do the VERP for you. That is faster than letting mailman do it. Thanks, Jacob

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman speed

Brad Knowles wrote: At 4:22 PM +0200 2004-07-06, Jacob Friis Larsen wrote: Is Mailman as fast as sending 3000 mails with 10 recipients in BCC, or even faster? We currently send 3 newsletters twice a day, and would like to find out if Mailman is as fast as our current system. Everything

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman speed

At 4:22 PM +0200 2004-07-06, Jacob Friis Larsen wrote: Is Mailman as fast as sending 3000 mails with 10 recipients in BCC, or even faster? We currently send 3 newsletters twice a day, and would like to find out if Mailman is as fast as our current system. Everything will depend on your con

[Mailman-Users] Mailman speed

Is Mailman as fast as sending 3000 mails with 10 recipients in BCC, or even faster? We currently send 3 newsletters twice a day, and would like to find out if Mailman is as fast as our current system. Thanks, Jacob -- Mailman-Users mailing