Michael Kabot writes:
> I would love to help, but afraid my Python experience is non
> existent.
If you have coded in any language, well, Python is very readable. Try
reading the Mailman code, starting with the email module. If you
like, then help with the code. If it leaves you cold, contin
C++ .
Mike
| -Original Message-
| From: Brad Knowles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 12:16 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mailman-users@python.org
| Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman roadmap
|
| On 7/9/07, Michael Kabot wrote:
|
| > I'd like to add a +1 for
On 7/9/07, Michael Kabot wrote:
> I'd like to add a +1 for multiple domain support as well.
Barry's answered this one. All desires aside, the only real
solutions we've found for this problem require some pretty massive
architectural changes, at which point we're right back where we
started f
: Monday, July 09, 2007 7:03 AM
| To: David Lee
| Cc: mailman-users@python.org
| Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman roadmap
|
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| On Jul 9, 2007, at 4:28 AM, David Lee wrote:
|
| > I would like to register a "+1" towards at least t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 9, 2007, at 4:28 AM, David Lee wrote:
> I would like to register a "+1" towards at least the beginnings of
> proper,
> multiple-domain support. No need at all for this to be the whole
> thing,
> but at least its basic foundations. Even ju
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2007, at 4:23 PM, Krystal F. Zipfel wrote:
>
> > Is there any consideration made, or is it possible to have Mailman
> > recognize that "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is different than
> > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", and operate as normal based on that?
>
> I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 7, 2007, at 4:23 PM, Krystal F. Zipfel wrote:
> Is there any consideration made, or is it possible to have Mailman
> recognize that "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is different than
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", and operate as normal based on that?
Hi Krystal,
On Jul 7, 2007, at 3:23 PM, Krystal F. Zipfel wrote:
> Currently, Mailman looks at the list-name as strictly "list-name",
> instead
> of "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
This is by far and away my biggest "feature request" as well. Each
virtual
domain should be its own private name space for list names.
normal based on that?
Just a thought. :-) Glad to see Mailman on the move!
Krystal
- Original Message
From: Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mailman Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Mailman Users
Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2007 12:36:54 PM
Subject: [Mailman-Users] Mailman ro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry, I forgot to cross-post this to mailman-users, so I'm reposting.
- -Barry
Now that we've successfully navigated the switch to Bazaar, it's time
to lay out plans for future Mailman releases. I've talked to several
people about what to do abo
10 matches
Mail list logo
