Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman redundancy setup

2012-10-25 Thread Mark Sapiro
David Westlund > >* If we store lock files on an NFS area and one node goes down without >removing any locks, will the other node be able to start mailman? It depends. If you run mailmanctl with the -s or --stale-lock-cleanup option, it will remove the other master's lock. Note that mailmanctl

[Mailman-Users] Mailman redundancy setup

2012-10-25 Thread David Westlund
Hi I am investigating doing a redundant setup of a mailman installation. We do not care about load balancing, only fail over. I have read through all I can found about this, including the following article on the FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=4030621 I am planning to so

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman redundancy

2001-04-04 Thread Steve Pirk
This helps a lot... Thank you! It all makes sense now. Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] Owner/Admin deathcon.com - pirk.com webops.com - disclaimer.com -- On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Christopher P. Lindsey wrote: > > Yes. The sendmail.cw file specifies which hosts should be treated > the same as localhost,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman redundancy

2001-04-04 Thread Phydeaux
At 10:06 AM 4/4/2001 -0700, Steve Pirk wrote: >A simpler solution would be to use backup mail servers. It would >be fairly hard (IMHO) to keep multiple mailman installs in sync. >I would use the main DSL server to actually run the list, but add >in 2 other MX servers to "hold" your mail until your

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman redundancy

2001-04-04 Thread Jerry Adlersfluegel
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Steve Pirk wrote: > Ok, so you then add the "domain" that is used for the mailing > list to the sendmail.cw file or it's equivalent (domains I > accept mail for). > > Would the secondary/third servers then then try to deliver > it locally? That is where I get confused :-)

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman redundancy

2001-04-04 Thread Christopher P. Lindsey
> Ok, so you then add the "domain" that is used for the mailing > list to the sendmail.cw file or it's equivalent (domains I > accept mail for). > > Would the secondary/third servers then then try to deliver > it locally? That is where I get confused :-) Yes. The sendmail.cw file specifies

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman redundancy

2001-04-04 Thread Steve Pirk
>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > > On 4/4/01, 12:06:41 PM, Steve Pirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Re: > [Mailman-Users] Mailman redundancy: > > > > A simpler solution wo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman redundancy

2001-04-04 Thread Steve Pirk
A simpler solution would be to use backup mail servers. It would be fairly hard (IMHO) to keep multiple mailman installs in sync. I would use the main DSL server to actually run the list, but add in 2 other MX servers to "hold" your mail until your line comes back... zone file: INMX 5

[Mailman-Users] Mailman redundancy

2001-04-04 Thread Jarvis, John
I have a small list on a dsl connection and the evil company Verizon can't seem to maintain very well. What I would like to do is implement list redundancy across two machines that have different ISPs. Out of curiosity as anyone successfully done this? Could be fun to set up, I am thinking a co