Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman port

2010-04-22 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Lindsay Haisley writes: > Isn't Signal 11 generally an indication of a hardware (e.g. memory) > failure? No. This is what Windows calls a "general protection fault", and it means that you've attempted to access memory that the operating system thinks you shouldn't. Possibly the most common lo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman port

2010-04-22 Thread Grant Taylor
On 04/22/10 12:35, Lindsay Haisley wrote: Isn't Signal 11 generally an indication of a hardware (e.g. memory) failure? I don't think it's an indication of hardware failure so much as hardware failure is one of the things that can cause a program to dump its core. Grant. . . . -

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman port

2010-04-22 Thread Lindsay Haisley
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 11:32 -0500, Peter Clark wrote: > > Compiling /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/TopicMgr.py ... > Compiling /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/UserDesc.py ... > Compiling /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Utils.py ... > Compiling /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Version.py ... > Compiling /usr/local/mai

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman port

2010-04-22 Thread Mark Sapiro
Peter Clark wrote: > >I tried to install the mailman port (FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 amd64) this >morning and it bombs out during the install phase: > > >Compiling /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/TopicMgr.py ... >Compiling /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/UserDesc.py ... >Compiling /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Ut

[Mailman-Users] Mailman port

2010-04-22 Thread Peter Clark
Hello, I tried to install the mailman port (FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 amd64) this morning and it bombs out during the install phase: Compiling /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/TopicMgr.py ... Compiling /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/UserDesc.py ... Compiling /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Utils.py ... Compili

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman port RH7.3/2.0.13 to FC4/2.1.5/Exim4

2005-12-13 Thread Gary Stainburn
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 16:10, Mark Sapiro wrote: > You have not created or moved your site list (named mailman) to the new > installation. Thus, mailmanctl refuses to start the queue runners. > Thanks Mark. I'd just found that and sorted it. Unfortunately, I'd just removed everything mailm

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman port RH7.3/2.0.13 to FC4/2.1.5/Exim4

2005-12-13 Thread Mark Sapiro
Gary Stainburn wrote: > >I'm trying to port my existing mailman setup to my new server. I've made note >of the change of filesystem layout and followed the instructions for >connecting to Exim4. I've configured Apache and the web interface to >mailman's working fine. I can perform admin functi

[Mailman-Users] Mailman port RH7.3/2.0.13 to FC4/2.1.5/Exim4

2005-12-13 Thread Gary Stainburn
Hi folks I'm trying to port my existing mailman setup to my new server. I've made note of the change of filesystem layout and followed the instructions for connecting to Exim4. I've configured Apache and the web interface to mailman's working fine. I can perform admin functions and view the a