>I am 100% sure that is not it. If it were, sending mail without using
> mailman to [EMAIL PROTECTED] would result in the mail arriving at
> localhost.
Ok make that %50. I just tested again and my MTA sends the mail to
localhost when sending to [EMAIL PROTECTED] without mailman.
Howev
> mailman sent the message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but your MTA decided that
> localhost was good enough. Have a look at your mailer tables to see if
> your localhost system also claims to be able to receive mail for foo.com
I am 100% sure that is not it. If it were, sending mail without using
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:18:30PM -0400, Justin F. Knotzke wrote:
>
>I am using Mailman 2.1.2 on a Debian box with Exim 4.2.
>
>When I add myself to a list as say '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' (where mailman
> is not installed or virtual-hosted on foo.com). Mailman always sends the
> mail to jknot
I am using Mailman 2.1.2 on a Debian box with Exim 4.2.
When I add myself to a list as say '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' (where mailman
is not installed or virtual-hosted on foo.com). Mailman always sends the
mail to jknotzke on localhost instead of @foo.com because there is a
jknotzke account on lo
