Brad Knowles wrote:
>On 3/11/08, Mark Sapiro quoted Luca Villani:
>
>>> As far as mm_cfg.py must be different on each server, it prevent to
>>> export the entire /usr/local/mailman.
>>
>> Correct.
>
>Couldn't you put both configuration files in the same directory, with
>slightly different file
On 3/11/08, Mark Sapiro quoted Luca Villani:
>> As far as mm_cfg.py must be different on each server, it prevent to
>> export the entire /usr/local/mailman.
>
> Correct.
Couldn't you put both configuration files in the same directory, with
slightly different file names, and then specify on th
Luca Villani wrote:
>On mar, 2008-03-11 at 15:44 +0100, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>
>> This still requires some patching or other machinations. First, this
>> approach assumes that all the mutable Mailman directories are shared
>> (NFS or ??) across machines.
>
>Yes, NFS, exported by a Netapp filer.
>W
On mar, 2008-03-11 at 15:44 +0100, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> This still requires some patching or other machinations. First, this
> approach assumes that all the mutable Mailman directories are shared
> (NFS or ??) across machines.
Yes, NFS, exported by a Netapp filer.
We was planning to export the e
Luca Villani wrote:
>
>We're starting to move our internal mailman from a single server to a
>multiple servers architecture (starting with two servers).
>
>
>Digging on the list, we find two approaches to this problem:
>
>http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2006-November/054641.html
>htt
Hi.
First, I'm afraid my English is very poor, sorry... :-|
We're starting to move our internal mailman from a single server to a
multiple servers architecture (starting with two servers).
Digging on the list, we find two approaches to this problem:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-u
On 6/14/07, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> How close to possible is this idea? Is there something I should read?
> I checked the FAQ and didn't see anything...
You probably did the intelligent thing and searched for the word
"cluster" and didn't find it. That's because FAQ 4.75 didn't have
that keyw
I am trying to build a nice failover system for random parts of our
infrastructure. Does anyone know how to force mailman to replicate
changes over to another identically configured system?
I thought about using rsync for this but I am trying to keep the sync
triggered by updates on the primary s
