Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Bug

On 02/04/2015 09:10 AM, James Sceets wrote: > Ok we are running version 2.1.5 on an old White Box server and are > encountering this bug which is preventing us from accessing the > membership management pages for some (but not all) of our mailing > lists. > > "if bucket not in digits + '_' + lowe

[Mailman-Users] Mailman Bug

Ok we are running version 2.1.5 on an old White Box server and are encountering this bug which is preventing us from accessing the membership management pages for some (but not all) of our mailing lists. "if bucket not in digits + '_' + lowercase: TypeError: 'in ' requires character as left oper

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman bug or browser behaviour?

Geoff Shang wrote: > >On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >> Geoff Shang wrote: >>> >>> I've noticed that if I go to pending Moderator requests and approve a >>> message from a particular user, if I leave the resulting page open which >>> says "Click here to reload this page" and another messa

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman bug or browser behaviour?

Hi, Reserecting an old thread. On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Mark Sapiro wrote: Geoff Shang wrote: I've noticed that if I go to pending Moderator requests and approve a message from a particular user, if I leave the resulting page open which says "Click here to reload this page" and another message fr

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman bug or browser behaviour?

Mark Sapiro wrote: > >The underlying problem is that the data posted from the summary page >says "apply the selected action to all messages from this user" rather >than "apply the selected action to all messages from this user that >were displayed on the page". I have reported this at

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman bug or browser behaviour?

Geoff Shang wrote: > >I've noticed that if I go to pending Moderator requests and approve a >message from a particular user, if I leave the resulting page open which >says "Click here to reload this page" and another message from that user >comes through which requires approval, if I click to re

[Mailman-Users] Mailman bug or browser behaviour?

Hi, I've noticed an odd thing but am not sure if it's Mailman (2.1.11) or my browser (Lynx 2.8.7dev.9) which is at fault. I've noticed that if I go to pending Moderator requests and approve a message from a particular user, if I leave the resulting page open which says "Click here to reload

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Bug?/no Admin level web access

005 22:04:56 -0400 Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Bug?/no Admin level web access On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 21:33 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Mailman created a new file, but the others show as plain text and the > new one as octet stream. I'm afraid I don't understand.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Bug?/no Admin level web access

On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 21:33 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Mailman created a new file, but the others show as plain text and the > new one as octet stream. I'm afraid I don't understand. What "others" and what do you mean the new log file is octet stream? > Right now I'm at accept all on port

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Bug?/no Admin level web access

In a message dated 5/17/2005 6:30:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How did this file get created? Did Mailman create it? If so, then the question is "why can Mailman create this file but not be allowed to write to it?". Would SELinux be the answer? Have you tried testing with

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Bug?/no Admin level web access

Elissa wrote: >I trashed the old mailman error log. I now have a new 0k >file called error. I can send invites, etc using mailman so I know it's >working as expected. How did this file get created? Did Mailman create it? If so, then the question is "why can Mailman create this file but not be a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Bug?/no Admin level web access

I can send invites, etc using mailman so I know it's working as expected. Elissa -Original Message- From: John Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: mailman-users@python.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue, 17 May 2005 13:23:47 -0400 Subject: Re: [M

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Bug?/no Admin level web access

On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 13:02 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > May 10th was the day I put in the new hard drive after the old one > died. So basically I did a clean install. I had set up the domain/host > stuff on the old drive so all I did was reinstall. I only have one > domain/host name, and

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Bug?/no Admin level web access

s. Elissa - -- Message: 3 Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 14:46:36 +0900 From: Jim Tittsler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Bug?/no Admin level web access To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Mailman-users list Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/p

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Bug?/no Admin level web access

> >Elissa wrote: > > > >>I'm hoping someone can help me fix this. I installed mailman, and >>couldn't figure out why the web interface didn't work. It seems I CAN >>access any of the pages, but the admin ones. I get a lovely message in >>the browser: >>"Bug in Mailman version 2.1.6rc3 >> >>We

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Bug?/no Admin level web access

On May 17, 2005, at 11:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In response to the > question about checking permissions, yes, I've run it several > times, and > genaliases, check_db and anything else I thought might provide a > clue. All checked > out ok. Are you running with SELinux enabled? (Are th

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Bug?/no Admin level web access

In a message dated 5/16/2005 6:37:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, that doesn't work. My reply to you was bounced by AOL because * 554 HVU:B1 http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554hvub1.html This may be true, but the server mail doesn't get checked nearly

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Bug?/no Admin level web access

>Elissa wrote: > >> >>I'm using my aol address to make sure I get my mail. Well, that doesn't work. My reply to you was bounced by AOL because * 554 HVU:B1 http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554hvub1.html EXPLANATION: There is at least one URL in your email that is genera

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Bug?/no Admin level web access

Elissa wrote: >I'm hoping someone can help me fix this. I installed mailman, and >couldn't figure out why the web interface didn't work. It seems I CAN >access any of the pages, but the admin ones. I get a lovely message in >the browser: >"Bug in Mailman version 2.1.6rc3 > >We're sorry, we hit

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Bug?/no Admin level web access

On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 02:14:02PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm hoping someone can help me fix this. I installed mailman, and > couldn't figure out why the web interface didn't work. It seems I CAN > access any of the pages, but the admin ones. I get a lovely message in > the browser: >

[Mailman-Users] Mailman Bug?/no Admin level web access

I'm hoping someone can help me fix this. I installed mailman, and couldn't figure out why the web interface didn't work. It seems I CAN access any of the pages, but the admin ones. I get a lovely message in the browser: "Bug in Mailman version 2.1.6rc3 We're sorry, we hit a bug! Please inform

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman bug

Thanks Mark, That fixed it, at least temporarily. I did have to change the name with mv before I removed it. Mark Ballard Site Technology Specialist El Molino High School http://www.elmolino.org On Feb 27, 2005, at 10:28 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: Mark Ballard wrote: Mailman has been working fine fo

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman bug

Mark Ballard wrote: Mailman has been working fine for a couple of week now and it just stopped with a bug. Below is what it tells me when I go to admindb on any list. any ideas??? Bug in Mailman version 2.1.2 File "/usr/share/mailman/Mailman/MailList.py", line 487, in __save os.unlink(fnam

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman bug

Mark Ballard wrote: >Mailman has been working fine for a couple of week now and it just >stopped with a bug. > >Below is what it tells me when I go to admindb on any list. > >any ideas??? > >Bug in Mailman version 2.1.2 > > File "/usr/share/mailman/Mailman/MailList.py", line 487, in __save >

[Mailman-Users] mailman bug

Mailman has been working fine for a couple of week now and it just stopped with a bug. Below is what it tells me when I go to admindb on any list. any ideas??? Bug in Mailman version 2.1.2 We're sorry, we hit a bug! If you would like to help us identify the problem, please email a copy of this p

[Mailman-Users] mailman bug

ii mailman2.1.4-1Powerful, web-based mailing list manager ii python2.3 2.3.3-5An interactive high-level object-oriented la Hi there, I would like to report a bug in mailman 2.1.4, which only surfaces, when config_list is used to import a configuration file that sets

[Mailman-Users] Mailman Bug?

Hi, Trying to figure this one out. Twice now in the past month, a mailing list has died here. You cannot login to the administrative interface and posts go into into a logjam. >From the logs I see: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailman]# tail error NotLockedError: Aug 02 16:38:52 2003 qrunner(28147): T

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman "bug"?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 mcobb wrote: > Everytime I try to create a list I get the following error. > However, the list is actually created? I'm running mailman 2.1, > postfix 1.11 and Apache. Any help appreciated. [...] > RuntimeError: command failed: /usr/sbin/postalias > /u

[Mailman-Users] Mailman "bug"?

Folks, Everytime I try to create a list I get the following error. However, the list is actually created? I'm running mailman 2.1, postfix 1.11 and Apache. Any help appreciated. Mike Bug in Mailman version 2.1.1 We're sorry, we hit a bug! If you would like to help us identify the problem, ple

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman bug

Stephen McKeown wrote: > This just started. I buy my hosting from a company, and they have great > support, but I haven't heard back yet on this one so I thought it might help > if I could give them some pointers on what to do. Or if you could suggest a > solution I could do myself. There's

[Mailman-Users] Mailman bug

Hi all, When I try to access my list info page, or any other list page or admin page, I get the following error: Bug in Mailman version 2.0 We're sorry, we hit a bug! Please inform the webmaster for this site of this problem. Printing of traceback and other system information has been explicitl

[Mailman-Users] Mailman bug

Hi all, When I try to access my list info page, or any other list page or admin page, I get the following error: Bug in Mailman version 2.0 We're sorry, we hit a bug! Please inform the webmaster for this site of this problem. Printing of traceback and other system information has been explicitl