I'm not a Debian guru, but I imagine that the reason 2.1.3 is not
available on stable is that it simply has not been out long enough.
Also, version 2.1.3 requires a relatively modern version of Python on
the server.
The real question to ask the Debian guru's is: why aren't they using
version 2.0.1
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 17:54, Pascal Blanchette wrote:
> I was wondering if there was a reason why the only Mailman version available
> as a stable debian package is version 2.0.11?
Debian has a strange terminology. They tend to use "stable" where other
people would use "obsolete".
Many of the pa
Pascal Blanchette said:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if there was a reason why the only Mailman version
> available as a stable debian package is version 2.0.11?
> Version 2.1.3 is marked as unstable.
That is just the way Debian is. "Stable" is ultra conservative. "Testing"
has more recent packages.
Hi,
I was wondering if there was a reason why the only Mailman version available
as a stable debian package is version 2.0.11?
Version 2.1.3 is marked as unstable. Is the new version still in beta or is
it ready to be deployed on a production site. In other words, would you
recommend upgrading fr
