Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman version 2.1.16 -- Search of *private* archives?

Hi, It sounds like you now have it sorted with Namazu, but for what it's worth there is an excellent guide to install Namazu "out of the box" on Mailman 2.1.* at: http://bakacsin.ki.iif.hu/~kissg/project/mailman+namazu/ And no issues with Private archives or incorrect URLs. /Mark On

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman version 2.1.16 -- Search of *private* archives?

At Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:20:42 -0700 Mark Sapiro wrote: > > On 8/24/19 1:15 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > > > > OK, I have installed Namazu, which will do what I want, *BUT* pipermail.pl > > is > > missing from the tarball I downloaded from the Namazu website. Where can I > > get that file. At

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman version 2.1.16 -- Search of *private* archives?

On 8/24/19 1:15 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > > It is not clear if any of the options on that page will work for *private* > archives. Most seem to be using an *external* third party search engine. > I'm > guessing I need to write a script (*I* don't know phthon and don't really > like > PHP)

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman version 2.1.16 -- Search of *private* archives?

On 8/24/19 1:15 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > > OK, I have installed Namazu, which will do what I want, *BUT* pipermail.pl is > missing from the tarball I downloaded from the Namazu website. Where can I > get that file. At this point, the search works, but the URI's are wrong > (local file name,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman version 2.1.16 -- Search of *private* archives?

At Sat, 24 Aug 2019 08:46:50 -0700 Mark Sapiro wrote: > > On 8/24/19 5:59 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > > Is it possible to have a search (eg by keyword) feature available for > > private > > archives with Mailman version 2.1.16? There is no obvious setting for it. > > > See

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman version 2.1.16 -- Search of *private* archives?

At Sat, 24 Aug 2019 08:46:50 -0700 Mark Sapiro wrote: > > On 8/24/19 5:59 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > > Is it possible to have a search (eg by keyword) feature available for > > private > > archives with Mailman version 2.1.16? There is no obvious setting for it. > > > See

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman version 2.1.16 -- Search of *private* archives?

On 8/24/19 5:59 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > Is it possible to have a search (eg by keyword) feature available for private > archives with Mailman version 2.1.16? There is no obvious setting for it. See . -- Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, San F

[Mailman-Users] Mailman version 2.1.16 -- Search of *private* archives?

Is it possible to have a search (eg by keyword) feature available for private archives with Mailman version 2.1.16? There is no obvious setting for it. -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software-- Custom Software Services http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Linux Administr

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Version

Jeff Bernier wrote: >I have inherited a Mailman list manager system, and I am currently trying to >establish a regular backup for this system, as well as move a couple of lists >over to it from an older system which is being retired. This new system is a >Mac OS X Server running 10.5.4, Mailman

[Mailman-Users] Mailman Version

I have inherited a Mailman list manager system, and I am currently trying to establish a regular backup for this system, as well as move a couple of lists over to it from an older system which is being retired. This new system is a Mac OS X Server running 10.5.4, Mailman 2.1.9, and Python 2.5.1.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Version

On 11/14/07, Mark Sapiro wrote: > IMO, security through obscurity is doomed to failure. Agreed. Any serious attacker, or anyone with moderately serious attack tools, is going to fingerprint the box and all the applications with something like Nessus, nmap, etc... and they'll know better than

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Version

Joey Prestia wrote: >Is there a way to remove the Mailman version number reference that is >displayed at the bottom of the web interface pages. I am hesitant on >implementing it with the version number displayed so as to help out >anyone that might care to take a stab at hacking it. Ironicall

[Mailman-Users] Mailman Version

Is there a way to remove the Mailman version number reference that is displayed at the bottom of the web interface pages. I am hesitant on implementing it with the version number displayed so as to help out anyone that might care to take a stab at hacking it. -- Joey Prestia [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman version 2.1.9, content filtering action changed??

Mark Sapiro wrote: >Arthur Hatch wrote: >> >>Remove message attachments that have a matching content type. >>(Details for filter_mime_types) >> >>image >>multipart("trial addition of: >> multipart/mixed >>

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman version 2.1.9, content filtering action changed??

Arthur Hatch wrote: > >I need some help with unexplained behaviour changes to the "Content >Filtering" action of a Mailman list, version 2.1.9. The Mailman list >is Xx, and the unexplained behaviour was first noticed with e-mail >postings on/after Sept.6/07. And what happened on Sept 6, '07.

[Mailman-Users] Mailman version 2.1.9, content filtering action changed??

Hi, I need some help with unexplained behaviour changes to the "Content Filtering" action of a Mailman list, version 2.1.9. The Mailman list is Xx, and the unexplained behaviour was first noticed with e-mail postings on/after Sept.6/07. The unwelcome changes are that since Sept.6/07, the C

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman - version 2.0.13

My cats watched as td wrote: > Our company uses Mailman version 2.0.13. > > The problem I have with this software is that, you have to search > sometimes for a long time, to find the users in the lists, who > wants to unsubscribe. v2.1.* has both a mass subscribe and mass unsubscribe features.

[Mailman-Users] Mailman - version 2.0.13

Dear Python.org. Our company uses Mailman version 2.0.13. The GNU we use isn't Unix. The problem I have with this software is that, you have to search sometimes for a long time, to find the users in the lists, who wants to unsubscribe. This is a long and time-eating process. Is there a way to