Ahh, this is very useful. I will try this setting and see how it works.
Thanks.
From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 10/10/2006 11:31 PM
To: Joyce, Wesley K.; mailman-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Problems - Serious
Joyce, Wesley K. wrote:
>
>Yes I do, but am I correct in thinking the bounce processing isn't going to
>happen because postfix is killing the session from mailman before it completes?
I suspect you are correct in this. It depends on what SMTPDirect sees
in the return from the SMTP transaction, b
PM
To: Joyce, Wesley K.; mailman-users@python.org
Subject: RE: [SPAM] - Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Problems - Serious - Found
word(s) list error in the Text body
Joyce, Wesley K. wrote:
>
>Adding this debuglevel immediatly revealed some useful information.
>
>Postfix is returning '4
: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Problems - Serious
Joyce, Wesley K. wrote:
>I am getting concerned about the stability of mailman. About 3 weeks ago I
>encountered the bug that required I change Bouncer.py line.
>time.strftime('%d-%b-%Y', day + (0,)*6)) to time.strftime('%d-%b-%
Joyce, Wesley K. wrote:
>I am getting concerned about the stability of mailman. About 3 weeks ago I
>encountered the bug that required I change Bouncer.py line.
>time.strftime('%d-%b-%Y', day + (0,)*6)) to time.strftime('%d-%b-%Y', day +
>(0,0,0,0,1,0))).
>
>Since then, I have started encounte
I am getting concerned about the stability of mailman. About 3 weeks ago I
encountered the bug that required I change Bouncer.py line.
time.strftime('%d-%b-%Y', day + (0,)*6)) to time.strftime('%d-%b-%Y', day +
(0,0,0,0,1,0))).
Since then, I have started encountering errors like this
Oct 10 2
