Folks,
We're in the process of switching www.python.org to a new
machine, and it may take a while for the DNS changes to propagate.
In the meanwhile, we're disallowing updates to the Mailman FAQ
Wizard on the old machine, so that we can make sure we've got the
absolute latest m
> "MN" == Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MN> OT: Will Mailman 2.1 recognize the (?!...) Python negative
MN> lookahead assertion in "Hold posts with header value matching
MN> a specified regexp."?
It will recognize any regexp supported by the version of Python you're
runn
> "JN" == Joern Nettingsmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Also note that the FAQ wizard is specifically intended to be
>> community supported. It is maintained through an honor system,
>> and the password is "Mailman". Feel free to make updates!
JN> i sent a faq suggest
"Barry A. Warsaw" wrote:
>
>
> Also note that the FAQ wizard is specifically intended to be community
> supported. It is maintained through an honor system, and the password
> is "Mailman". Feel free to make updates!
i sent a faq suggestion about another topic to mailman-cabal a week
ago, but
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 21:14, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
>
> > "MN" == Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> MN> I noticed that most of the answers in the Mailman FAQ wizard
> MN> [1] assume that you have site admin access. Many of us are
> MN> only list managers. Solutions to p
> "MN" == Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MN> I noticed that most of the answers in the Mailman FAQ wizard
MN> [1] assume that you have site admin access. Many of us are
MN> only list managers. Solutions to problems that work for site
MN> admins may not work for list
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 02:37, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> J C Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Alternatively, I could set up a separate FAQ Wizard for (less
> > > technical) list manager questions at listowner.org ... would this be
> > > desirable?
> >
> > Why not simply create a less tech
On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 20:22, J C Lawrence wrote:
> On Wed, 1 May 2002 01:20:49 +0200
> Norbert Bollow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Alternatively, I could set up a separate FAQ Wizard for (less
> > technical) list manager questions at listowner.org ... would this be
> > desirable?
>
> Why no
J C Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Alternatively, I could set up a separate FAQ Wizard for (less
> > technical) list manager questions at listowner.org ... would this be
> > desirable?
>
> Why not simply create a less technical section in the current FAQ?
* I think that listowners and
> exception that the mail isn't going through - I get "unknown user"
> error. Was I to create an account?
>
> because there IS no account created with the ./newlist script,
newlist instructs you to add aliases to support the new list.
The section of INSTALL that talks about running newlist al
ard GUI installer and manager that would run in Gnome/KDE.
Thanks for the help, I'm close...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of J C Lawrence
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:22 PM
To: Norbert Bollow
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
On Wed, 1 May 2002 01:20:49 +0200
Norbert Bollow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alternatively, I could set up a separate FAQ Wizard for (less
> technical) list manager questions at listowner.org ... would this be
> desirable?
Why not simply create a less technical section in the current FAQ?
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed that most of the answers in the Mailman FAQ wizard [1] assume
> that you have site admin access. Many of us are only list managers.
> Solutions to problems that work for site admins may not work for list
> managers.
>
> Is there a preferred way t
I noticed that most of the answers in the Mailman FAQ wizard [1] assume
that you have site admin access. Many of us are only list managers.
Solutions to problems that work for site admins may not work for list
managers.
Is there a preferred way to modify the FAQ Wizard for answers to list
manager
14 matches
Mail list logo
