Hi,
I installed mailman in my Solaris 7 machine e was Ok, but when I sent
a message to list "teste" I receive the following message :
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
"|/usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman post teste"
(reason: 2)
(expanded from: <[EMAIL PROTEC
> "ADC" == Andrew D Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ADC> So, if I understand this correctly, if ArchRunner is the
ADC> first named qrunner (the default), it will have to complete
ADC> its run before an other qrunner will be able to process their
ADC> queues. Is this correct
To quote from bin/qrunner:
"Each named runner class is run in round-robin fashion. In other words, the
first named runner is run to consume all the files currently in its
directory. When that qrunner is done, the next one is run to consume all
the
files in /its/ directory, and so on. The numbe
Doesn't look like it helps when the backlog is associated with only one
particular high volume list, as it seems (by looking at the /locks
directory) that only one qrunner can operate on a given list at a time.
The other ArchRunner is basically idle. However, it might help if the
qrunner tasks
I recently upgraded from mailman 2.0.12 to 2.1b3 and am quite pleased with
the new qrunner setup (among other things). We have one particularly high
volume list with very bursty postings (since the main poster is scripting
postings). In mailman 2.0.12 we'd often have hundreds of files stuck in
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:21:47 -0400 (EDT)
Fuzzy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [repost]
>
> application version
> --- ---
> mailman 2.1b3
> python2.2.1
> apache1.3.23
> sendmail 8.11.6
>
>
> I have some lists that migated to
Hi All,
I'm a bit of a newbie in relation to Mailman and Python, but I have successfully installed Mailman 2.1b3 on a Sparc/Linux 6.2 (Zoot) box, and everything has been peachy until I try to gate mail to news and vice versa.
I configured the news server today (innd), and can successfully post an
> "EM" == Erik Myllymaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
EM> Is this correct behaviour?
It's definitely documented to only go to the list owners.
EM> I thought the bounces that get past the auto bounce detection
EM> woulod only go to the list owner, but they seem to be going to
Is this correct behaviour?
I thought the bounces that get past the auto bounce detection woulod only go
to the list owner, but they seem to be going to all the moderators too...
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.pytho
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002 13:24:58 -0400 (EDT)
Fuzzy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> application version
> --- ---
> mailman 2.1b3
> python2.2.1
> apache1.3.23
> sendmail 8.11.6
>
>
> I have some lists that migated to a virtual dom
At 14:42 19/08/2002 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>* Richard Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020819 14:23]: wrote:
> > At 20:30 17/08/2002 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> >
> > >Is the configuration of htdig intergration for 2.1b3 any different than
> > >2.0.x ?
> >
> > Not as far as Mailma
* Richard Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020819 14:23]: wrote:
> At 20:30 17/08/2002 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>
> >Is the configuration of htdig intergration for 2.1b3 any different than
> >2.0.x ?
>
> Not as far as Mailman config variables are concerned.
>
> >I have done that but on
At 20:30 17/08/2002 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>Is the configuration of htdig intergration for 2.1b3 any different than
>2.0.x ?
Not as far as Mailman config variables are concerned.
>I have done that but on test I get an error:
>
>beastie% sudo ./nightly_htdig -v
>Skipping htdig for li
Is the configuration of htdig intergration for 2.1b3 any different than 2.0.x ?
I have done that but on test I get an error:
beastie% sudo ./nightly_htdig -v
Skipping htdig for list; no htdig setup: freebsd-geeks
cheers
- wash
+--+-
I am running 2.1b3 but I seem to have missed a point. How do I make sure
the qrunner is 'alive' all the time? I run on FreeBSD.
cheers
- wash
+--+-+
Odhiambo Washington, [EMAIL PROTECTED] . WANANCHI ONLINE
I have just uploaded to sourceforge new versions of the following patches
which are MM 2.1b3 compatible:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=444879&group_id=103&atid=300103
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=444884&group_id=103&atid=300103
I have made
At 08:27 14/08/2002 +0200, Roelf Schreurs wrote:
>Hi
>
>I just installed the mailman 2.1b3 and would like to use htdig to search
>the archives. But the 2 plugins needed only has up to version 2.1b2. Any
>idea when the plugins will be available for beta 3? Or are they available
>somewhere apart
Hi
I just installed the mailman 2.1b3 and would like
to use htdig to search the archives. But the 2 plugins needed only has up to
version 2.1b2. Any idea when the plugins will be available for beta 3? Or are
they available somewhere apart from the plugins page on soureforge?
Thanks
Roelf
18 matches
Mail list logo
